From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com, kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock: fix `vsock_proto` declaration
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:43:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175193540775.3455828.16493006355772974081.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250703112329.28365-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 13:23:29 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
> From commit 634f1a7110b4 ("vsock: support sockmap"), `struct proto
> vsock_proto`, defined in af_vsock.c, is not static anymore, since it's
> used by vsock_bpf.c.
>
> If CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not defined, `make C=2` will print a warning:
> $ make O=build C=2 W=1 net/vmw_vsock/
> ...
> CC [M] net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.o
> CHECK ../net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> ../net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:123:14: warning: symbol 'vsock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] vsock: fix `vsock_proto` declaration
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/1e3b66e32601
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-03 11:23 [PATCH net] vsock: fix `vsock_proto` declaration Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-03 11:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-07-08 0:43 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175193540775.3455828.16493006355772974081.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.