From: "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@gmx.net>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: xen versioning scheme
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:01:26 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17526.1147082486@www055.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1147082279.445f1627a1ae7@webmail.sprang.de
Hi,
I realized that the changes in xen versions between minor versions 3.0.1
and 3.0.2 seem to be quite big. One example seems to be API changes as
big as pci passthrough (I just read about it but didn't test that) and
that the linux kernel configs seem to be quite different, at least in
the xen section, probably also in the rest, so theyr aren't re-usable
between these versions without major diffing hassles.
I admit, it isn't possible to got to Kernel 2.6.12 to 2.6.16 without
changing the kernel config file, but I am not sure if it's a good idea then
to make such big changes in such minor version steppings.
But you might have your reasons, and might even be able to explain them, or
have a versioning scheme ruleset. Is there something like that?
Henning
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-08 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1147082279.445f1627a1ae7@webmail.sprang.de>
2006-05-08 10:01 ` Henning Sprang [this message]
2006-05-08 10:12 ` xen versioning scheme Henning Sprang
2006-05-05 21:44 Henning Sprang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17526.1147082486@www055.gmx.net \
--to=henning_sprang@gmx.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.