From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE9C1DC9B5; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 01:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752715789; cv=none; b=n57hZDJ53QgY2fjbDhwnkUt9rOpxq8s/praM8c2JNOabu80AJNIyTyHbOAdrlPFKYPq6FVpG1OK5ulynL1kAc397Xa2ZglbIbxudyAfQjg7UQMl/bORd+0D0dsdRWYMFMuEA7uwbELxULJIJY+yUyl4TLeMO9GNJKvf0OUg/fmo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752715789; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4ZNCZwXvNH9vuMgkk/NS1R5HXJ7/MpNDC0QStIdElmA=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=Vy638lK21nY6fWEAgC02WiN8xdnrO/Ug05k6P3JMTdlMqmREfkYoKpf/fCr3kcPxoEbS/uriBmTNZR+sWLLn8Czg7ZXFaKffnN5kO03DD40o5fR+4erciyRcDMZuKvovgHKbjiNuijsIfkKEda7kCjrOzF+1LJ3d2pbpk5Mqq98= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YjhE2soT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YjhE2soT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE572C4CEE7; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 01:29:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752715789; bh=4ZNCZwXvNH9vuMgkk/NS1R5HXJ7/MpNDC0QStIdElmA=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=YjhE2soT7mhlqrz+/hkv3UjIrd5XJxlzIWKRy4zyAirX+U4A0rLCOdVJwIcMAKtkF EhftIpSOliE6OCY8gTiRvb2rYVSFqA+VyPfVRzBwB7Ae9Ii2EdpNA47RpiuSpQiSym PVgiVPuUPCqNbS3LUCrQEP4AFeqqYfkB1N06MBSOQCcLjm/q7jEGCYNJssogem0mRK rQ799N8bkepZb/UQ6iPmhDA1sD9VyJfvMMBha52u1ql5LGmVsyKmSiAhpUn89fw1iG /PDFnM3DngrNaJY6ET5b5fAAzinjgQLualv6oSvVbESwkarCId05yWhVkQk6cWYVVc CcPguFCGX43ng== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593D0383BA38; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 01:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bpf, arm64: relax constraint in BPF JIT compiler From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <175271580926.1388574.2871718742808894447.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 01:30:09 +0000 References: <20250709-arm64_relax_jit_comp-v1-0-3850fe189092@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20250709-arm64_relax_jit_comp-v1-0-3850fe189092@bootlin.com> To: =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=3Calexis=2Elothore=40bootlin=2Ecom=3E?=@aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org, xukuohai@huaweicloud.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, shuah@kernel.org, ebpf@linuxfoundation.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 10:36:54 +0200 you wrote: > Hello, > this series follows up on the one introducing 9+ args for tracing > programs [1]. It has been observed with this series that there are cases > for which we can not identify accurately the location of the target > function arguments to prepare correctly the corresponding BPF > trampoline. This is the case for example if: > - the function consumes a struct variable _by value_ > - it is passed on the stack (no more register available for it) > - it has some __packed__ or __aligned(X)__ attribute > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [1/2] bpf, arm64: remove structs on stack constraint https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dc704d0cfa43 - [2/2] selftests/bpf: enable tracing_struct tests for arm64 https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4a760d2d7aa6 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html