From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17544.35914.790308.357011@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:44:58 +0200 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] unit testing context switches. In-Reply-To: <44887A1F.20003@domain.hid> References: <17536.40316.183366.284818@domain.hid> <17543.5163.684144.582942@domain.hid> <44871DF8.9010903@domain.hid> <17544.6126.256649.862048@domain.hid> <44885FDA.8080301@domain.hid> <17544.28567.517655.60691@domain.hid> <44887A1F.20003@domain.hid> From: Gilles Chanteperdrix List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Heikki Lindholm Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Heikki Lindholm wrote: > One more thing though: Having always the same values doesn't tell if the > task's state is overwritten with some "older generation" of its state or > something odd like that. The state-saving will only need to work once > and if it sucks rest of the time nobody knows. Or was that accounted for > in the code? (Didn't read it all that carefully, lazy me) That is right, the new implementation compute a different value for each switch. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix.