From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7789524F for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754437793; cv=none; b=YnId/aOnWoxi+DkoAAgPzyj2sdHqgu6cdvV0YhSqdxV5KEd30FM7IH5e96tPKZICC1lxShkPklkvE3LayNdtL2dw2srExaWh2JsbLF4TP0QN3o/7BOZr/TTwbwvgyFYwwnL7tUOViDvn5SgKfqIF0gjyR+J8sdZnbGvMKmr/VD4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754437793; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bSZU2q8jz8ffEhpv7GHe2zykfBOOmzyqjhoX4vJaARQ=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=XBlVhctssbcDBKpE2ZzGPRVQ7dwiOsNzdWPKmbZjDoesuGUDxBuf6PmRGxo9lwDylHprjoMxpIBhFHATBxRe19VHsEZYeiINEJC3yIidMrVTKQgHF8UZHJf0as1XpBMUx6J+sfQ7H8XF9m00/3TCfnnroas9clZP/leVesNwjgY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jdXt4uj9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jdXt4uj9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7302FC4CEF0; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:49:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754437792; bh=bSZU2q8jz8ffEhpv7GHe2zykfBOOmzyqjhoX4vJaARQ=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=jdXt4uj9TjKA9/leesBLd0nZnfeR2cSB+leUO+708M5ApcU9l8AcdC3neei48KlsK QzsPLsnGMOzlchGAKs2p/frwNcCVcn3l8Q1NYeVV7FFxv4mJxC1OZLb3EHVsgWWzMi NFx6fE3ioVO2Smgdho/1cyqv+lGM+9R2tU0kkmRXdJfnr3luJI9+QZt9wyQe98ZCUg 3vVb3+j17kAv+SuJsV3+v6chJAg55flYX6tP8uKvpiBQVnQLfwX/jXqmqOJts67czL XI7qJeq1UAmja6Cy7HvCGG5ADddl8EtL3BWIrJnG1DA4gX/sUSWLKhDgFjIRuJ0ep2 J2qShqfyli2WQ== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCB7383BF63; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: netdevsim: Xfail nexthop test on slow machines From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <175443780651.2205590.13469597711317035634.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 23:50:06 +0000 References: <20250804114320.193203-1-idosch@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20250804114320.193203-1-idosch@nvidia.com> To: Ido Schimmel Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, petrm@nvidia.com Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 14:43:20 +0300 you wrote: > A lot of test cases in the file are related to the idle and unbalanced > timers of resilient nexthop groups and these tests are reported to be > flaky on slow machines running debug kernels. > > Rather than marking a lot of individual tests with xfail_on_slow(), > simply mark all the tests. Note that the test is stable on non-debug > machines and that with debug kernels we are mainly interested in the > output of various sanitizers in order to determine pass / fail. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net] selftests: netdevsim: Xfail nexthop test on slow machines https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/8d22aea8af0d You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html