From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17550.61982.685449.470866@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:13:02 +0200 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] ns vs. tsc as internal timer base In-Reply-To: <448EF022.1040901@domain.hid> References: <448E98A3.6080707@domain.hid> <448E9E8B.70809@domain.hid> <448EA7F7.5000802@domain.hid> <448EB038.8070802@domain.hid> <448EE593.7010809@domain.hid> <448EF022.1040901@domain.hid> List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: Jan Kiszka , xenomai-core Philippe Gerum wrote: > Redone the check here on a Centrino 1.6Mhz, and still have roughly x20 > improvement (a bit better actually). I'm using Debian/sarge gcc 3.3.5. I think I remember that Pentium M has a much shorter mull instruction than other processors of the family. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix.