From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Detlef Vollmann <dv@domain.hid>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>, xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Some questions about the ARM port (Integrator vs. PXA)
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17577.4096.436840.354535@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44A8D7A1.4E4E9D27@domain.hid>
Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> It's not so difficult to work around the problem for a single system.
> What's difficult is to find a solution in a framework that wasn't
> built with such a problem in mind.
Actually, all architectures have a delay below which they can not be
reprogrammed fast enough. This delay is simply 0 for all of them.
How about rewriting rthal_timer_program_shot as:
static inline void rthal_timer_program_shot (unsigned long delay)
{
if(delay < __ipipe_mach_min_delay)
rthal_trigger_irq(RTHAL_TIMER_IRQ);
else
__ipipe_mach_set_dec(delay);
}
And define __ipipe_mach_min_delay to be 8 ticks for the PXA architecture ?
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-03 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 8:38 [Xenomai-core] Some questions about the ARM port (Integrator vs. PXA) Detlef Vollmann
2006-06-29 14:46 ` Stelian Pop
2006-06-30 6:31 ` Detlef Vollmann
[not found] ` <44A4C4CB.5F24DA68@domain.hid>
2006-06-30 8:53 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 5:56 ` Detlef Vollmann
2006-07-03 6:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-03 8:38 ` Detlef Vollmann
2006-07-03 9:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-03 12:39 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2006-07-03 13:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-07-04 6:43 ` Detlef Vollmann
2006-07-04 14:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-05 22:32 ` Detlef Vollmann
2006-07-05 22:42 ` Detlef Vollmann
2006-07-05 13:03 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-07-05 23:44 ` Detlef Vollmann
2006-07-06 7:15 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17577.4096.436840.354535@domain.hid \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=dv@domain.hid \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.