From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE07F2288D5 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758235209; cv=none; b=BjR620L31OjGrA98BpVPqGxCwDLEjbdU3FXCO6ixISMmN0f4LBTCeNuS4gNo0fnXlAsREit0uvkBPYOkmXiQo6T53m9ssUgKqRFMlYtMapIBw5knT1H1RO/2QuwxFkICAQWjUDNhtu43K1vZEa8/TZTKlc6hhXwcf5qH1dsr/U4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758235209; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZJX+HnEBvDNEqpmtG9H3b7QgUO6zFa9ogNYkofUql58=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=O35y94Pi11SsjHn2VNkVLemAcv+iefbW0DVl2Whvy9hIxh5xEgEynueEs7twcRbotRBESdCCP+uZRKVVaimiw+a71qoWLa8t4sdB7/uQ0IOxvshZ1cFkpBjbU8kvSrAdzGIzereClzMCqqenP1kcoET+7GYhBmHUJrGPThEiKpE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Pz832gEi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Pz832gEi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F842C4CEE7; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:40:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758235209; bh=ZJX+HnEBvDNEqpmtG9H3b7QgUO6zFa9ogNYkofUql58=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=Pz832gEisUnLsQuazKv9igQDdC79iq+vYKKf4Sd/JOSzmicbfpkQaF3hNnXLIfysp M3lG1/2AFhmZAAuaSyTK+0X0+5tRYLeLNEI2qgZuKQCpGbB5cVBf3GvYL9ByLhMp16 d7gFzHXn/LuYKFmzAbk9EYrsWxSK8aGwxG0v5X2K7uNbosbO822Dxn6t67BA5tNROc BGxg2UAx3pWLp/DPQi2Vk3x1pNuwkSL1gAEN0nafVFO/IE+5cWVKpQEnfS04Cuz3K+ tu8tR0xtZ12bIJFT3aeUy0ONA25DXfdv48EYuBosl8snkiw7O1pAlRiaIsITPM3vMy XS9AzUoX6jdyw== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4794539D0C20; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] Update KF_RCU_PROTECTED From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <175823520925.2974709.5913309884000579325.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:40:09 +0000 References: <20250917032755.4068726-1-memxor@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20250917032755.4068726-1-memxor@gmail.com> To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org, arighi@nvidia.com, kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 03:27:53 +0000 you wrote: > Currently, KF_RCU_PROTECTED only applies to iterator APIs and that too > in a convoluted fashion: the presence of this flag on the kfunc is used > to set MEM_RCU in iterator type, and the lack of RCU protection results > in an error only later, once next() or destroy() methods are invoked on > the iterator. While there is no bug, this is certainly a bit unintuitive, > and makes the enforcement of the flag iterator specific. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpf: Enforce RCU protection for KF_RCU_PROTECTED https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1512231b6cc8 - [bpf-next,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for KF_RCU_PROTECTED https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8b788d663861 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html