All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, kafai@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	yatsenko@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: add _impl suffix for kfuncs with implicit args
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 02:00:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <176230800954.3058815.2709221007373602170.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104-implv2-v3-0-4772b9ae0e06@meta.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 22:54:24 +0000 you wrote:
> We have established a pattern of function naming win "_impl" suffix;
> those functions accept verifier-provided bpf_prog_aux argument.
> Following uniform convention will allow for transparent backwards
> compatibility with the upcoming KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS feature. This patch
> set aims to fix current deviation from the convention to eliminate
> unnecessary backwards incompatibility in the future.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v3,1/2] bpf:add _impl suffix for bpf_task_work_schedule* kfuncs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/ea0714d61dea
  - [bpf,v3,2/2] bpf: add _impl suffix for bpf_stream_vprintk() kfunc
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/137cc92ffe2e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-04 22:54 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: add _impl suffix for kfuncs with implicit args Mykyta Yatsenko
2025-11-04 22:54 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf:add _impl suffix for bpf_task_work_schedule* kfuncs Mykyta Yatsenko
2025-11-04 22:54 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] bpf: add _impl suffix for bpf_stream_vprintk() kfunc Mykyta Yatsenko
2025-11-04 23:08 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: add _impl suffix for kfuncs with implicit args Ihor Solodrai
2025-11-05  2:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=176230800954.3058815.2709221007373602170.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.