All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, g.djavadyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 03:30:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <176352302649.209489.15960953294481237254.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251115095939.6967-1-fmancera@suse.de>

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 10:59:38 +0100 you wrote:
> When an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) is received for a prefix, the
> kernel creates the corresponding on-link route with flags RTF_ADDRCONF
> and RTF_PREFIX_RT configured and RTF_EXPIRES if lifetime is set.
> 
> If later a user configures a static IPv6 address on the same prefix the
> kernel clears the RTF_EXPIRES flag but it doesn't clear the RTF_ADDRCONF
> and RTF_PREFIX_RT. When the next RA for that prefix is received, the
> kernel sees the route as RA-learned and wrongly configures back the
> lifetime. This is problematic because if the route expires, the static
> address won't have the corresponding on-link route.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/2,net-next,v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f72514b3c569
  - [2/2,net-next,v2] selftests: fib_tests: add fib6 from ra to static test
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d7dbda878920

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-15  9:59 [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-11-15  9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-next v2] selftests: fib_tests: add fib6 from ra to static test Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-11-19  2:56 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route David Ahern
2025-11-19  3:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2025-12-10 15:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=176352302649.209489.15960953294481237254.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=g.djavadyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.