From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Harden cpu flags test for lru_percpu_hash map
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:40:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176946000512.169775.3162391575586650912.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119133417.19739-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:34:17 +0800 you wrote:
> CI occasionally reports failures in the
> percpu_alloc/cpu_flag_lru_percpu_hash selftest, for example:
>
> First test_progs failure (test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-llvm-21):
> #264/15 percpu_alloc/cpu_flag_lru_percpu_hash
> ...
> test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag:FAIL:bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu unexpected bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu: actual 0 != expected 3735929054
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Harden cpu flags test for lru_percpu_hash map
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/78980b4c7fcb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 13:34 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Harden cpu flags test for lru_percpu_hash map Leon Hwang
2026-01-26 20:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-26 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176946000512.169775.3162391575586650912.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.