From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com, leitao@debian.org,
noren@nvidia.com, gal@nvidia.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: py: give bpftrace more time to start
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 02:30:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177371461053.3397946.6102878609227085799.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260315160038.3187730-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 09:00:38 -0700 you wrote:
> After commit under Fixes debug runners in the CI hit the following:
>
> # subprocess.TimeoutExpired: Command '['bpftrace', '-f', 'json', '-q', '-e', 'kprobe:netpoll_poll_dev { @hits = count(); } interval:s:10 { exit(); }']' timed out after 15 seconds
> # # Exception| net.lib.py.ksft.KsftFailEx: bpftrace failed to run!?: {}
>
> in netpoll_basic.py >10% of the time. Let's give bpftool more time
> to start, it can take a while on a debug kernel.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] selftests: net: py: give bpftrace more time to start
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6a33a706265d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 16:00 [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: py: give bpftrace more time to start Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-16 9:05 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-16 9:33 ` Petr Machata
2026-03-16 15:25 ` Nimrod Oren
2026-03-17 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177371461053.3397946.6102878609227085799.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.