From: Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: system hangs due to qgroups
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 19:40:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1776088.42rHLKPlSp@thetick> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3186 bytes --]
Hello all,
I'm having some trouble with btrfs on a laptop, possibly due to qgroups.
Specifically, some file system activities (e.g., snapshot creation,
baloo_file_extractor from KDE Plasma) cause the system to hang for up to about
40 minutes, maybe more. It always causes (most of) my desktop to hang,
(although I can usually navigate between pre-existing Konsole tabs) and
prevents new programs from starting. I've seen the system load go up to >30
before the laptop suddenly resumes normal operation. I've been seeing this
since Linux 4.7, maybe already 4.6.
Now, I thought that maybe this was (indirectly) due to an overly full file
system (~90% full), so I deleted some things I didn't need to get it up to 15%
free. (For the record, I also tried mounting with ssd_spread.) After that, I
ran a balance with -dusage=50, which started out promising, but then went back
to the "bad" behaviour. *But* it seemed better than before overall, so I
started a balance with -musage=10, then -musage=50. That turned out to be a
mistake. Since I had to transport the laptop, and couldn't wait for "balance
cancel" to return (IIUC it only returns after the next block (group?) is
freed), I forced the laptop off.
After I next turned on the laptop, the balance resumed, causing bootup to
fail, after which I remembered about the skip_balance mount option, which I
tried in a rescue shell from an initramfs. But wait, that failed, too!
Specifically, the stack trace I get whenever I try it includes as one of the
last lines:
"RIP [<ffffffff8131226f>] qgroup_fix_relocated_data_extents+0x1f/0x2a8"
(I can take photos of the full stack trace if requested.)
So then I ran "btrfs qgroup show /sysroot/", which showed many quota groups,
much to my surprise. On the upside, at least now I discovered the likely
reason for the performance problems.
(I actually think I know why I'm seeing qgroups: at one point I was trying out
various snapshot/backup tools for btrfs, and one (I forgot which)
unconditionally activated quota support, which infuriated me, but I promptly
deactivated it, or so I thought. Is quota support automatically enabled when
qgroups are discovered, or did I perhaps not disable quota support properly?)
Since I couldn't use skip_balance, and logically can't destroy qgroups on a
read-only file system, I decided to wait for a regular mount to finish. That
has been running since Tuesday, and I am slowly growing impatient.
Thus I arrive at my question(s): is there anything else I can try, short of
reformatting and restoring from backup? Can I use btrfs-check here, or any
other tool? Or...?
Also, should I be able to avoid reformatting: how do I properly disable quota
support?
(BTW, searching for qgroup_fix_relocated_data_extents turned up the ML thread
"[PATCH] Btrfs: fix endless loop in balancing block groups", could that be
related?)
The laptop is currently running Gentoo with Linux 4.8.10 and btrfs-progs
4.8.4.
Greetings
--
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-03 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-03 18:40 Marc Joliet [this message]
2016-12-03 20:42 ` system hangs due to qgroups Chris Murphy
2016-12-03 21:46 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-03 22:56 ` Chris Murphy
2016-12-04 16:02 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-04 18:24 ` Duncan
2016-12-04 19:20 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 2:32 ` Duncan
2016-12-04 18:52 ` Chris Murphy
2016-12-05 9:00 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 10:16 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 23:22 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-19 11:17 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-04 2:10 ` Adam Borowski
2016-12-04 16:02 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 0:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-12-05 11:01 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 12:10 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 14:43 ` [SOLVED] " Marc Joliet
2016-12-06 0:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-12-06 10:12 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-06 14:55 ` Marc Joliet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1776088.42rHLKPlSp@thetick \
--to=marcec@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.