From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Wayen.Yan <win847@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: airoha: Fix debugfs new-tuple display for IPv4 ROUTE entries
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 23:00:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178139160838.1619194.4028591531296512566.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a2be54b.ef98c1b2.3c3224.2ed8@mx.google.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 07:09:56 +0800 you wrote:
> In airoha_ppe_debugfs_foe_show(), the second switch statement falls
> through from PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_HNAPT/DSLITE to PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_ROUTE,
> accessing hwe->ipv4.new_tuple for all three types. However, IPv4 ROUTE
> (3-tuple) entries do not contain a valid new_tuple — this field is only
> meaningful for NATted flows (HNAPT/DSLITE). For ROUTE entries, the
> memory at the new_tuple offset holds routing information, not NAT data,
> so displaying "new=" produces garbage output.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] net: airoha: Fix debugfs new-tuple display for IPv4 ROUTE entries
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/1c3a77471afb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 23:09 [PATCH v2] net: airoha: Fix debugfs new-tuple display for IPv4 ROUTE entries Wayen.Yan
2026-06-12 10:58 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-13 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178139160838.1619194.4028591531296512566.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=win847@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.