From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: aconole@redhat.com, echaudro@redhat.com, i.maximets@ovn.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: conntrack: annotate ct limit hlist traversal
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:20:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178240444754.3803792.2094048119456951265.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624150149.3510541-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 23:01:49 +0800 you wrote:
> ct_limit_set() is documented as being called with ovs_mutex held. It
> walks the ct limit hlist with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(), but the
> iterator does not currently pass the OVS lockdep condition used
> elsewhere for RCU-protected OVS objects.
>
> Pass lockdep_ovsl_is_held() to the iterator. This matches the function's
> existing caller contract and lets CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST distinguish the
> ovs_mutex-protected update path from the RCU read-side ct_limit_get()
> path.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] openvswitch: conntrack: annotate ct limit hlist traversal
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/0e901ee5c6f9
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 15:01 [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: conntrack: annotate ct limit hlist traversal Runyu Xiao
2026-06-25 7:21 ` Eelco Chaudron
2026-06-25 16:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178240444754.3803792.2094048119456951265.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.