From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: fsverity@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, emil@etsalapatis.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsverity: Fix bpf_get_fsverity_digest() dynptr assumptions
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:30:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178582860939.3014158.15212060647956229102.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731003925.2728977-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:39:25 +0000 you wrote:
> The BPF verifier and the dynptr abstraction ensure that the memory space
> referenced by a dynptr remains valid. They do not, however, provide any
> guarantee that the contents of the memory are stable. kfuncs are
> expected to remain memory-safe even if concurrent modifications occur.
>
> bpf_get_fsverity_digest() didn't follow that: it could crash if
> arg->digest_size was concurrently modified.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- fsverity: Fix bpf_get_fsverity_digest() dynptr assumptions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/3e8ec7c03872
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 0:39 [PATCH] fsverity: Fix bpf_get_fsverity_digest() dynptr assumptions Eric Biggers
2026-08-01 16:52 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 17:15 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-01 17:35 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 17:38 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 20:18 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-01 20:47 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 21:02 ` Song Liu
2026-08-04 7:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178582860939.3014158.15212060647956229102.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.