From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Rastislav Szabo <rastislav.szabo@isovalent.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
shuah@kernel.org, dima@arista.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net/tcp: fix TCP-AO key deletion in VRFs
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:10:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178782540674.1145855.8291296014675389448.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260822201119.272269-1-rastislav.szabo@isovalent.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 22:11:18 +0200 you wrote:
> TCP-AO keys with TCP_AO_KEYF_IFINDEX store the VRF L3 interface index in
> l3index. tcp_ao_del_cmd() validates the supplied ifindex, but does not
> assign it to its local l3index before matching keys.
>
> As a result, deleting a key scoped to a non-default VRF always fails with
> ENOENT because it is matched against l3index 0.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2,1/2] net/tcp: fix TCP-AO key deletion in VRFs
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/94ad9e114a1c
- [net,v2,2/2] selftests: net: tcp_ao: test VRF-scoped key deletion
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/687e5b48c4f5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-22 20:11 [PATCH net v2 1/2] net/tcp: fix TCP-AO key deletion in VRFs Rastislav Szabo
2026-08-22 20:11 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: net: tcp_ao: test VRF-scoped key deletion Rastislav Szabo
2026-08-27 10:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178782540674.1145855.8291296014675389448.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rastislav.szabo@isovalent.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.