From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: mmc@linux.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, nnac123@linux.ibm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, haren@linux.ibm.com,
ricklind@linux.ibm.com, davemarq@linux.ibm.com,
bjking1@linux.ibm.com, shaik.abdulla1@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v6,09/15] ibmveth: Harden RX poll path with helpers
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:10:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178845903884.3394541.9429373266253586035@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0302ff17e945a742d0f0b79265ee556e3bf66a.1788102125.git.mmc@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 2 (1) · Medium: 2 · Low: 0
- [High] The new ibmveth_poll_stopping() check placed between
napi_complete_done() and ibmveth_enable_irq() cannot prevent a…
- [High] The new oversize guard in ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame() bounds
the PHYP-reported offset+length against skb_tailroom(skb) instead of…
- [Medium] A real, user-visible sk_buff leak fix is buried inside a
199-line helper-extraction patch with no Fixes: tag and no Cc: stable.
- [Medium] All 'skip the slot' outcomes (invalid descriptor, bad
correlator, oversize offset+length) neither increment frames_processed…
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] ibmveth_remove() calls cancel_work_sync(&adapter->work) while
the netdev is still registered and RX NAPI/IRQ paths are live, then…
--
ibmveth: Harden RX poll path with helpers
This splits the RX slot handling in ibmveth_poll() into a set of small
helpers (poll_stopping, harvest_slot, recycle_invalid, skip_bad_correlator,
drop_oversize, deliver_frame, bump_invalid) so the NAPI callback becomes a
thin budget loop. Along with the motion it adds an offset+length bounds
check before skb_put(), frees the copybreak skb on a harvest error, and
adds stopping checks so close/napi_disable does not re-arm PHYP delivery.
A few questions below.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> index 46f68f5b52e70..f726d1e3f0b11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2382,125 +2380,236 @@ static void ibmveth_rx_csum_helper(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> }
>
[ ... ]
> +static bool ibmveth_poll_harvest_slot(struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + int queue_index, bool reuse)
> +{
> + int rc = ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, queue_index, reuse);
> +
> + return !rc || rc == -EINVAL || rc == -EFAULT;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Can this helper ever return false? ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer() documents
and returns only 0, -EINVAL or -EFAULT:
rc = ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool(adapter, cor, queue_index, reuse);
if (unlikely(rc)) {
/* Skip a corrupt slot without claiming pool ownership. */
if (rc == -EINVAL || rc == -EFAULT)
ibmveth_rxq_advance(rxq);
return rc;
}
so every "break" in ibmveth_poll_recycle_invalid(),
ibmveth_poll_skip_bad_correlator() and ibmveth_poll_drop_oversize() looks
unreachable.
Combined with the budget accounting in the loop below, is there anything
left that bounds one ibmveth_poll() invocation? A skipped slot returns 0
from ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame(), so neither the break nor
frames_processed++ runs:
rc = ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame(napi, adapter, netdev,
queue_index);
if (rc < 0)
break;
if (rc > 0)
frames_processed++;
and each skip recycles the slot with reuse=true, after which
ibmveth_replenish_task() re-posts it. The tail of ibmveth_poll() then does:
if (ibmveth_rxq_pending_buffer(adapter, queue_index) &&
napi_schedule(napi)) {
ibmveth_disable_irq(adapter, queue_index);
goto restart_poll;
}
which re-enters the loop in the same invocation with frames_processed
unchanged. If PHYP keeps publishing skippable slots (stale ring contents,
malformed completions), does the frames_processed == budget exit ever
become reachable, and does this poll ever return?
The reset escalation in ibmveth_poll_skip_bad_correlator() uses
schedule_work(), which queues on the current CPU via system_percpu_wq, so
would the worker be able to run while that CPU is stuck in the poll? The
ibmveth_poll_drop_oversize() path escalates nothing at all.
The commit message states:
Skipped and dropped slots do not count against the NAPI budget; only
a delivered frame does.
Is that intentional given it removes the only bound on the loop?
> +
> +static bool ibmveth_poll_recycle_invalid(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + int queue_index)
> +{
> + netdev_dbg(netdev, "recycling invalid buffer\n");
> + ibmveth_poll_bump_invalid(adapter, queue_index);
> + return ibmveth_poll_harvest_slot(adapter, queue_index, true);
> +}
> +
> +static bool ibmveth_poll_skip_bad_correlator(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + int queue_index)
> +{
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + netdev_err(netdev,
> + "bad correlator on queue %d, skipping slot\n",
> + queue_index);
> + /* Residual stale slot after resize: recover via reset rather
> + * than spinning forever. Always escalate; only the log is
> + * rate-limited.
> + */
> + schedule_work(&adapter->work);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this adds another NAPI-side
producer of adapter->work while ibmveth_remove() still cancels that work
before the device is quiesced:
cancel_work_sync(&adapter->work);
for (i = 0; i < IBMVETH_NUM_BUFF_POOLS; i++)
kobject_put(&adapter->rx_buff_pool[0][i].kobj);
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
Can a poll running on another CPU call schedule_work(&adapter->work) from
here (or from the ibmveth_enable_irq() failure path in ibmveth_poll())
after cancel_work_sync() has returned? Nothing cancels or flushes it
again, and adapter is netdev_priv(netdev), so the queued work_struct and
everything ibmveth_reset() touches would be freed by free_netdev().
For the record, the ordering appears to be repaired later in this series:
at the series tip ibmveth_remove() moves the cancellation after
unregister_netdev(), with a comment that cancel_work_sync() before
unregister left a window where poll could schedule_work() and the worker
ran after free_netdev().
> + ibmveth_poll_bump_invalid(adapter, queue_index);
> + return ibmveth_poll_harvest_slot(adapter, queue_index, true);
> +}
> +
[ ... ]
> +static int ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame(struct napi_struct *napi,
> + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + struct net_device *netdev,
> + int queue_index)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + room = skb_tailroom(skb);
> + off = offset;
> + len = length;
> + if (unlikely(off >= room || len > room - off)) {
> + if (!ibmveth_poll_drop_oversize(netdev, adapter, queue_index,
> + off, len, room))
> + return -1;
> + return 0;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Should the bound here be pool->buff_size rather than skb_tailroom(skb)?
ibmveth_replenish_buffer_pool() allocates, maps and advertises exactly
pool->buff_size to the hypervisor:
skb = netdev_alloc_skb(adapter->netdev, pool->buff_size);
...
dma_addr = dma_map_single_attrs(dev, skb->data, pool->buff_size,
DMA_FROM_DEVICE, DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN);
...
descs[filled].fields.flags_len = IBMVETH_BUF_VALID | pool->buff_size;
netdev_alloc_skb() rounds up to an allocator bucket, so skb_tailroom() on
an untouched pool buffer is larger than buff_size (a 16 KiB pool buffer
lands in a 32 KiB allocation). Does a PHYP-reported off+len in the
(buff_size, tailroom] gap pass this check and then get committed and
delivered?
skb_put(skb, length);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, netdev);
...
napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
That would hand uninitialised slab bytes outside the DMA mapping to the
stack, and on the copybreak path skb_copy_to_linear_data() plus
ibmveth_flush_buffer(skb->data, length + offset) would touch addresses
past the mapped window. The commit message says deliver "rejects a PHYP
offset+length that would skb_put() past the buffer" - is the buffer here
meant to be the hardware-visible one? The correlator has already been
validated by ibmveth_rxq_correlator_valid(), so
adapter->rx_buff_pool[queue_index][correlator >> 32].buff_size is
available as the bound.
> +
> + if (lrg_pkt) {
> + __be64 *rxmss = (__be64 *)(skb->data + 8);
> +
> + mss = (u16)be64_to_cpu(*rxmss);
> + }
> +
> + new_skb = NULL;
> + if (length < rx_copybreak)
> + new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length);
> +
> + if (new_skb) {
> + skb_copy_to_linear_data(new_skb, skb->data + offset, length);
> + if (rx_flush)
> + ibmveth_flush_buffer(skb->data, length + offset);
> + rc = ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, queue_index, true);
> + if (unlikely(rc)) {
> + kfree_skb(new_skb);
> + return -1;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
This kfree_skb(new_skb) is a real fix for an sk_buff leak that exists at
the baseline in ibmveth_poll():
new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length);
...
skb_copy_to_linear_data(new_skb, skb->data + offset, length);
...
if (unlikely(ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, true)))
break; /* new_skb is neither freed nor handed to the stack */
Could this be split into its own patch with a Fixes: tag (and Cc: stable)
so it can be routed to net and picked up by older trees? Buried in a
199-insertion helper extraction it is not separable for backporting. The
same applies to the new offset+length validation, which the commit message
describes as preventing an skb_put() past the buffer.
> + skb = new_skb;
> + } else {
> + rc = ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, queue_index, false);
> + if (unlikely(rc))
> + return -1;
> + skb_reserve(skb, offset);
> + }
[ ... ]
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> {
[ ... ]
> if (frames_processed == budget)
> goto out;
>
> if (!napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed))
> goto out;
>
> - /* We think we are done - reenable interrupts,
> - * then check once more to make sure we are done.
> + /*
> + * napi_disable() sets DISABLE then waits for this poll. Without a
> + * second stopping check here, enable_irq() can re-arm PHYP after
> + * resize already masked the queue; late IRQs then hit the handler
> + * after num_rx_queues was published lower (lab WARN at interrupt).
> */
> + if (ibmveth_poll_stopping(netdev, napi))
> + goto out;
> +
> rc = ibmveth_enable_irq(adapter, queue_index);
[Severity: High]
Does this check actually close the window it describes? It is a
check-then-act pair, and both predicates in ibmveth_poll_stopping() go
false exactly when teardown is finishing:
return !netif_running(netdev) || napi_disable_pending(napi);
napi_disable_locked() clears the DISABLE bit before returning:
clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state);
so napi_disable_pending() is false once close is past its wait. And
netif_running() stays true for the driver's internal close callers -
ibmveth_change_mtu(), ibmveth_set_mac_addr(), the features paths and
veth_pool_store() all do "if (netif_running(dev)) ibmveth_close(dev);".
Sequence:
CPU0 ibmveth_poll()
napi_complete_done() /* clears SCHED */
/* delayed: hard IRQ, or vCPU
dispatch preemption on a
shared-processor LPAR */
CPU1 ibmveth_change_mtu() -> ibmveth_close() -> ibmveth_cleanup_rx_interrupts()
napi_disable() /* clears DISABLE on return */
ibmveth_disable_irq(adapter, i);
synchronize_irq(adapter->queue_irq[i]);
free_irq(...)
CPU0 resumes:
if (ibmveth_poll_stopping(netdev, napi)) /* false */
goto out;
rc = ibmveth_enable_irq(adapter, queue_index); /* re-arms PHYP */
Can the queue end up unmasked after the final remask and after free_irq()
removed the handler? That is the case the commit message claims to close:
ibmveth_poll_stopping() ensures close/napi_disable does not re-arm PHYP.
Would moving the unmask before napi_complete_done(), or moving close's
final remask after synchronize_net(), be a more reliable ordering than
adding another check here? This looks unchanged at the series tip.
> if (rc) {
> netdev_err(netdev,
Thanks for looking at these.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/cover.1788102125.git.mmc%40linux.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 15:07 [PATCH net-next v6 00/15] ibmveth: Add multi-queue RX support Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/15] ibmveth: Add MQ RX hypercall wrappers and call definitions Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,01/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/15] ibmveth: Prepare MQ RX adapter data structures Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/15] ibmveth: Refactor RX resource allocation for MQ RX bring-up Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,03/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/15] ibmveth: Refactor buffer pool management for per-queue MQ RX Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,04/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/15] ibmveth: Refactor RX interrupt control for MQ RX queues Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,05/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/15] ibmveth: Refactor TX resource allocation in open/close paths Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,06/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/15] ibmveth: Add RX queue register helpers for MQ Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/15] ibmveth: Add queue-aware RX buffer submit helper " Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,08/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/15] ibmveth: Harden RX poll path with helpers Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/15] ibmveth: Enable multi-queue RX receive path Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,10/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/15] ibmveth: Add per-queue RX and TX statistics collection Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,11/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 12/15] ibmveth: Report MQ-aware RX counts in ethtool get_channels Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,12/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 13/15] ibmveth: Expose per-queue buffer pool details via debugfs Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 14/15] ibmveth: Implement incremental MQ RX queue resize Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,14/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 15/15] ibmveth: Complete set_channels down-path and mq_fallback max_rx cap Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,15/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178845903884.3394541.9429373266253586035@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjking1@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haren@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mmc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shaik.abdulla1@ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.