From: patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org
To: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com,
alex_lu@realsil.com.cn, max.chou@realtek.com,
allen_chen@realsil.com.cn, luiz.von.dentz@intel.com,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btrtl: Don't leak return code when parsing firmware format v2
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:00:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178846561855.3994681.6237344995216592209.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903-btrtl-fix-patch-sec-header-rc-leak-v1-1-0ce37e2149bd@rong.moe>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2026 03:18:59 +0800 you wrote:
> When key_id from chip is zero, rtlbt_parse_firmware_v2() intentionally
> ignores all security headers. However, the implementation simply breaks
> from a switch statement and leaks uninitialized return code `rc' (if the
> first section is a security one) or the previous section's `rc'.
>
> Fix it by really skipping a loop with `continue'. For consistency and
> readability, also do the same for the default case.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- Bluetooth: btrtl: Don't leak return code when parsing firmware format v2
https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/0aab041d532f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 19:18 [PATCH] Bluetooth: btrtl: Don't leak return code when parsing firmware format v2 Rong Zhang
2026-09-02 21:58 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-09-03 20:00 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178846561855.3994681.6237344995216592209.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org \
--cc=alex_lu@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=allen_chen@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=i@rong.moe \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=luiz.von.dentz@intel.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=max.chou@realtek.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.