From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz,
kohei.enju@gmail.com, enjuk@amazon.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, blair.steven@alliedtelesis.co.nz,
carl.smith@alliedtelesis.co.nz, horms@kernel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com, sx.rinitha@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] i40e: add support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash()
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:19:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178851359588.4131868.14209764775589320419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901211752.1922993-3-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
- [Medium] i40e_config_netdev() sets `netdev->xdp_metadata_ops =
&i40e_xdp_metadata_ops;` unconditionally…
--
i40e: add support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash()
This adds i40e_xdp_rx_hash() as an xdp_metadata_ops callback, extracting
the RSS hash and hash type from the RX descriptor the same way
i40e_rx_hash() does. A new I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_FLTSTAT_MASK helper is
added to i40e_type.h and the ops struct is installed on the netdev.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> index 4b11ae9ed8d53..e487d697a634f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -13582,6 +13583,34 @@ static int i40e_xdp(struct net_device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> +static int i40e_xdp_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *_ctx, u32 *hash,
> + enum xdp_rss_hash_type *rss_type)
> +{
> + const struct i40e_xdp_buff *ctx = (const void *)_ctx;
> + const union i40e_rx_desc *desc = ctx->desc;
> + struct libeth_rx_pt rx_ptype;
> + u8 raw_rx_ptype;
> + u64 status;
> +
> + status = le64_to_cpu(desc->wb.qword1.status_error_len);
> + raw_rx_ptype = FIELD_GET(I40E_RXD_QW1_PTYPE_MASK, status);
> + rx_ptype = libie_rx_pt_parse(raw_rx_ptype);
> +
> + if (!libeth_rx_pt_has_hash(ctx->xdp.rxq->dev, rx_ptype) ||
> + FIELD_GET(I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_FLTSTAT_MASK, status) !=
> + I40E_RX_DESC_FLTSTAT_RSS_HASH)
> + return -ENODATA;
> +
> + *hash = le32_to_cpu(desc->wb.qword0.hi_dword.rss);
> + *rss_type = rx_ptype.hash_type;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct xdp_metadata_ops i40e_xdp_metadata_ops = {
> + .xmo_rx_hash = i40e_xdp_rx_hash,
> +};
> +
> static const struct net_device_ops i40e_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_open = i40e_open,
> .ndo_stop = i40e_close,
[ ... ]
> @@ -13784,6 +13813,7 @@ static int i40e_config_netdev(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> i40e_vsi_config_netdev_tc(vsi, vsi->tc_config.enabled_tc);
>
> netdev->netdev_ops = &i40e_netdev_ops;
> + netdev->xdp_metadata_ops = &i40e_xdp_metadata_ops;
[Severity: Medium]
Should this assignment live inside the I40E_VSI_MAIN branch, next to where
the rest of the XDP capability state is set?
Earlier in i40e_config_netdev() the XDP capabilities are set only for the
main VSI:
if (vsi->type == I40E_VSI_MAIN) {
...
netdev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC |
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY |
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG;
netdev->xdp_zc_max_segs = I40E_MAX_BUFFER_TXD;
} else {
/* Relate the VSI_VMDQ name to the VSI_MAIN name ... */
but i40e_config_netdev() also runs for VMDQ2 netdevs, via i40e_vsi_setup():
switch (vsi->type) {
/* setup the netdev if needed */
case I40E_VSI_MAIN:
case I40E_VSI_VMDQ2:
ret = i40e_config_netdev(vsi);
Those macvlan-offload "<pf>v%d" netdevs get xdp_features == 0, and
i40e_xdp() rejects every ndo_bpf command on them:
if (vsi->type != I40E_VSI_MAIN)
return -EINVAL;
So no native XDP program can be attached there, and xmo_rx_hash can never
be reached on such a netdev.
Does this make the netlink capability report inconsistent? netdev_nl_dev_fill()
derives the xdp-rx-metadata-features bits purely from the presence of the
callback, with no cross-check against dev->xdp_features:
net/core/netdev-genl.c:netdev_nl_dev_fill() {
...
#define XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(_, flag, __, xmo) \
if (netdev->xdp_metadata_ops && netdev->xdp_metadata_ops->xmo) \
xdp_rx_meta |= flag;
...
}
which means a VMDQ2 netdev advertises NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_HASH ("Device is
capable of exposing receive packet hash via bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash()") while
rejecting XDP entirely.
The follow-up patch adding bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag() extends the same
unconditional assignment, so NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_VLAN_TAG ends up reported
on those netdevs too; the assignment is still unconditional at the end of the
series.
> netdev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
> i40e_set_ethtool_ops(netdev);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260901211752.1922993-1-anthony.l.nguyen%40intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 21:17 [PATCH net-next 0/4][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-09-01 (i40e) Tony Nguyen
2026-09-01 21:17 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] i40e: prepare for XDP metadata ops support Tony Nguyen
2026-09-01 21:17 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] i40e: add support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash() Tony Nguyen
2026-09-04 9:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-05 1:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-01 21:17 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] i40e: add support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag() Tony Nguyen
2026-09-01 21:17 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] i40e: Avoid repeating RX filter warning Tony Nguyen
2026-09-02 21:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 9:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-05 1:50 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-09-01 (i40e) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178851359588.4131868.14209764775589320419@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=blair.steven@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=carl.smith@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=enjuk@amazon.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kohei.enju@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sx.rinitha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.