From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, memxor@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 00/10] bpf: add missing precision propagation after bpf_register_is_null calls
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 01:20:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178857122039.1047271.17751024419566077235.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904-register-is-null-precise-fixes-v1-0-0f5a360ff15d@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 17:05:51 -0700 you wrote:
> Fix [1] uncovered a host of locations where the call to
> bpf_register_is_null() is not followed by a call to
> bpf_mark_chain_precision().
>
> check_map_kptr_access() is omitted as it is handled [2]
> by another series.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,01/10] bpf: mark a NULL call argument precise
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/1a3a10b030c9
- [bpf,02/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL helper argument
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/593c8eb0fb91
- [bpf,03/10] bpf: mark a NULL memory argument of a call precise
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/f1e418129f2e
- [bpf,04/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL global subprogram memory argument
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/100f4cc0d59b
- [bpf,05/10] bpf: mark a NULL kfunc argument precise
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/506ada89629e
- [bpf,06/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL kfunc argument
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/562d266d3fae
- [bpf,07/10] bpf: mark a NULL BTF_ID argument of a global subprogram precise
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/e726fc6b9afe
- [bpf,08/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL global subprogram BTF_ID argument
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/91957791663f
- [bpf,09/10] bpf: propagate mark_chain_precision() errors out of loop_flag_is_zero()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/1d7f8f191c06
- [bpf,10/10] bpf: use mark_arg_precision() in check_mem_size_reg()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/cf2475616b11
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-05 0:05 [PATCH bpf 00/10] bpf: add missing precision propagation after bpf_register_is_null calls Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 01/10] bpf: mark a NULL call argument precise Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 02/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL helper argument Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 03/10] bpf: mark a NULL memory argument of a call precise Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 0:51 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 04/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL global subprogram memory argument Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:51 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 05/10] bpf: mark a NULL kfunc argument precise Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:51 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 06/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL kfunc argument Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 07/10] bpf: mark a NULL BTF_ID argument of a global subprogram precise Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 0:05 ` [PATCH bpf 08/10] selftests/bpf: precision of a NULL global subprogram BTF_ID argument Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:06 ` [PATCH bpf 09/10] bpf: propagate mark_chain_precision() errors out of loop_flag_is_zero() Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:06 ` [PATCH bpf 10/10] bpf: use mark_arg_precision() in check_mem_size_reg() Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-05 0:51 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-05 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178857122039.1047271.17751024419566077235.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.