All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: matttbe@kernel.org
Cc: martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 05/15] mptcp: options: handle MPC data + csum reqd + no csum
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:49:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178896537514.219967.16760487622956837996@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-3-rc1-v2-5-df1de70348b6@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1 (1)

- [Low] Residual uninitialised read of `mp_opt->csum`: the patch closes
  the functional consumer of the uninitialised checksum…

Pre-existing issues:
- [Low] Reported concern (assessed as an intentional, documented
  behaviour change): a passive endpoint whose local checksum sysctl is…

--

mptcp: options: handle MPC data + csum reqd + no csum

The MP_CAPABLE parser now only honours the checksum required flag for
options that do not carry a data-len, so a peer that sets the flag on a
data-bearing MP_CAPABLE without appending the 2 bytes of checksum no
longer makes the receiver use an uninitialised csum field.

Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8684#section-3.1-23 [1]
Closes: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260803-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-2-rc6-v2-0-b8f496d71664%40kernel.org?part=1

> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index b8318e030138..92f27b9e087a 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static void mptcp_parse_option(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		 * In other words, the only way for checksums not to be used
>  		 * is if both hosts in their SYNs set A=0."
>  		 */
> -		if (flags & MPTCP_CAP_CHECKSUM_REQD)
> +		if ((flags & MPTCP_CAP_CHECKSUM_REQD) &&
> +		    opsize < TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA)
>  			mp_opt->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD;

[Severity: Low]
The commit message says "uninitialised bytes could be used for the 'csum'
field".  Is the uninitialised csum field itself still read after this
change?

In mptcp_parse_option(), mp_opt->csum is only assigned in the 24-byte
form:

	if (opsize == TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA_CSUM) {
		mp_opt->csum = get_unaligned((__force __sum16 *)ptr);
		mp_opt->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD;
		ptr += 2;
	}
	pr_debug("MP_CAPABLE version=%x, flags=%x, optlen=%d sndr=%llu, rcvr=%llu len=%d csum=%u\n",
		 version, flags, opsize, mp_opt->sndr_key,
		 mp_opt->rcvr_key, mp_opt->data_len, mp_opt->csum);

but the pr_debug() passes mp_opt->csum for every opsize, including the
22-byte MP_CAPABLE + data form this patch is about.

The struct is an uninitialised stack object in mptcp_incoming_options()
and in net/mptcp/subflow.c, and mptcp_get_options() only clears the
4-byte status group:

	*(u32 *)&mp_opt->status = 0;

while protocol.h declares csum outside of that group:

	u16	data_len;
	__sum16	csum;
	struct_group(status,

So when that dynamic-debug callsite is enabled, 2 bytes of stale stack
are formatted into dmesg on a remotely reachable path.  The same
pr_debug() also prints sndr_key/rcvr_key/data_len for short opsizes,
so the debug-print read predates this commit; it is mentioned here
because the commit message frames the fix as removing the uninitialised
use of csum, and a stable backporter may read it that way.

Would adding mp_opt->csum = 0 (or extending the region cleared in
mptcp_get_options()) address this at the root, rather than relying on
every consumer testing OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD?

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but a question about the
passive side losing the peer's checksum requirement in one corner case.

subflow_init_req() derives the requirement from the local sysctl only:

	subflow_req->csum_reqd = mptcp_is_checksum_enabled(sock_net(sk_listener));

and subflow_check_req() does not preserve OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD from the
SYN, so mptcp_sk_clone_init() is the only place where the passive side
picks up the peer's flag:

	if (mp_opt->suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD)
		WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, true);

With the new opsize test, a 22-byte MP_CAPABLE + data with the A bit set
no longer sets that suboption, so msk->csum_enabled stays false and
get_mapping_status() accepts the mapping without validation:

	if (unlikely(subflow->map_csum_reqd != csum_reqd))
		return MAPPING_INVALID;

For a Linux sender the two signals cannot diverge, since
mptcp_established_options_mp() and mptcp_write_options() both derive the
A flag and the checksum field from opts->csum_reqd, and RFC 8684 omits
the checksum field only when checksums are not in use, so only a
self-contradictory peer reaches this path.  The commit message already
covers that trade-off.  The gap where the peer's SYN A bit is never
stored in subflow_req is pre-existing and unchanged here.

Would it be worth a short note in the commit message that the passive
side's only source for the peer's A bit is the third ACK, so the new
condition also drops that signal for a data-bearing third ACK?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260908-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-3-rc1-v2-0-df1de70348b6%40kernel.org

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 14:07 [PATCH net v2 00/15] mptcp: misc fixes for v7.3-rc1 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 01/15] mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 15:32     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 02/15] mptcp: subflow: no need to copy thmac during ulp_clone Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 03/15] mptcp: syncookies: remember the request backup flag Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 04/15] mptcp: pm: kernel: drop pending ADD_ADDR when removing ID0 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 17:57     ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 05/15] mptcp: options: handle MPC data + csum reqd + no csum Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-09 18:03     ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 06/15] mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 15:54     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 18:05   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 07/15] selftests: mptcp: fix an UAF in mptcp_connect.c Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 08/15] mptcp: pm: userspace: fix address ID overflow Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 09/15] mptcp: pm: reset retrans_time when ADD_ADDR entry is reused Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 10/15] mptcp: remove unneeded READ_ONCE() annotation Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 11/15] selftests: mptcp: lib: dump nstat for the right test Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 12/15] selftests: mptcp: lib: get counters " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 16:17     ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 13/15] mptcp: options: fix uninit-value in mptcp_write_data_fin Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 14/15] mptcp: being below memory limit is a likely() condition Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 15/15] mptcp: avoid pruning for OoW data Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 15:50     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 18:07       ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-09 18:09 ` [PATCH net v2 00/15] mptcp: misc fixes for v7.3-rc1 Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-09 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178896537514.219967.16760487622956837996@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.