From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: edumazet@google.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mitch@sfgoth.com, 3chas3@gmail.com,
qingfang.deng@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] pppoatm: ensure a writable skb header
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 21:07:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178898805913.219967.13489586928492348974@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908090519.339696-1-edumazet@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
- [Medium] net/atm/pppoatm.c:pppoatm_send() — the SC_COMP_PROT "undo"
heuristic on the `nospace` path now makes its decision based on…
--
pppoatm: ensure a writable skb header
This replaces the open-coded skb_realloc_headroom() dance in pppoatm_send()
with skb_cow_head(), so the LLC header is pushed into headroom that is both
large enough and writable. It also removes the temporary skb allocation
that used to happen when the ATM socket buffer was full.
> diff --git a/net/atm/pppoatm.c b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
> index 6da52d12df68e..4ce7fa6e493e9 100644
> --- a/net/atm/pppoatm.c
> +++ b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
> @@ -317,21 +317,12 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> switch (pvcc->encaps) { /* LLC encapsulation needed */
> case e_llc:
> - if (skb_headroom(skb) < LLC_LEN) {
> - struct sk_buff *n;
> - n = skb_realloc_headroom(skb, LLC_LEN);
> - if (n != NULL &&
> - !pppoatm_may_send(pvcc, n->truesize)) {
> - kfree_skb(n);
> - goto nospace;
> - }
> - consume_skb(skb);
> - skb = n;
> - if (skb == NULL) {
> - bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
> - return DROP_PACKET;
> - }
> - } else if (!pppoatm_may_send(pvcc, skb->truesize))
> + if (skb_cow_head(skb, LLC_LEN)) {
> + bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return DROP_PACKET;
> + }
> + if (!pppoatm_may_send(pvcc, skb->truesize))
> goto nospace;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change how the SC_COMP_PROT undo heuristic behaves at the nospace
label for skbs that arrive with less than LLC_LEN headroom?
The head expansion now happens on the original skb, before the
pppoatm_may_send() admission check, so when admission fails we reach:
net/atm/pppoatm.c:pppoatm_send() {
...
nospace:
bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
if ((pvcc->flags & SC_COMP_PROT) && skb_headroom(skb) > 0 &&
skb->data[-1] == '\0')
(void) skb_push(skb, 1);
return 0;
}
For an skb that entered with zero headroom, skb_cow_head() goes through
pskb_expand_head(), which allocates with kmalloc_reserve() (no __GFP_ZERO)
and only copies the old data:
net/core/skbuff.c:pskb_expand_head() {
...
data = kmalloc_reserve(&size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
if (!data)
goto nodata;
size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
memcpy(data + nhead, skb->head, skb_tail_pointer(skb) - skb->head);
...
}
The new bytes in front of the copied data are never initialized, so is
skb->data[-1] here reading stale slab content rather than a byte this
function pulled? If that byte happens to be 0x00, the skb_push(skb, 1)
prepends a spurious zero to a frame from which nothing was ever pulled at:
if (skb->data[0] == '\0' && (pvcc->flags & SC_COMP_PROT))
(void) skb_pull(skb, 1);
Before this change the same case took the skb_realloc_headroom() branch,
freed the copy and jumped to nospace with the original zero-headroom skb, so
the skb_headroom(skb) > 0 test suppressed the push.
Frames written to /dev/ppp look like they can hit this: ppp_write() does
drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:ppp_write() {
...
skb = alloc_skb(count + pf->hdrlen, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!skb)
goto out;
skb_reserve(skb, pf->hdrlen);
...
}
and pppoatm never assigns chan.hdrlen, so pf->hdrlen is 0 and control frames
with a non-zero first protocol byte (LCP 0xc021, IPCP 0x8021, PAP 0xc023)
arrive with no headroom and no entry-time pull. With the VCC queue full,
pppoatm_may_send() returns 0 and the goto nospace path runs.
Would it be more robust to record whether the entry-time skb_pull(skb, 1)
actually happened in a local bool, and test that at nospace, instead of
inferring it from skb->data[-1]?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260908090519.339696-1-edumazet%40google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 9:05 [PATCH net] pppoatm: ensure a writable skb header Eric Dumazet
2026-09-09 21:07 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-12 15:33 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178898805913.219967.13489586928492348974@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mitch@sfgoth.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.