From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com,
kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v10 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:57:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178951306345.22033.3166494756326322419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914151340.3227501-11-dhowells@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
- [Medium] rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() charges the full token cost to
prep->quotalen at net/rxrpc/key.c:209 (`prep->quotalen += datalen +…
--
rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported
The RxGK key parser now looks up the userspace-supplied encryption type
with crypto_krb5_find_enctype() and rejects the token if the enctype is
unknown or if the supplied key length does not match the enctype. The
RxGK-specific token handling is also made conditional on CONFIG_RXGK.
Link: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260824091645.415423-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/key.c b/net/rxrpc/key.c
> index cbd26da449510..cdef609996d28 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/key.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/key.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -166,12 +167,14 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
> size_t datalen,
> const __be32 *xdr, unsigned int toklen)
> {
> + const struct krb5_enctype *enc;
> struct rxrpc_key_token *token, **pptoken;
> time64_t expiry;
> size_t plen;
> const __be32 *ticket, *key;
> s64 tmp;
> size_t raw_keylen, raw_tktlen, keylen, tktlen;
> + int ret = -EKEYREJECTED;
>
> _enter(",{%x,%x,%x,%x},%x",
> ntohl(xdr[0]), ntohl(xdr[1]), ntohl(xdr[2]), ntohl(xdr[3]),
[ ... ]
> @@ -229,6 +232,17 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
> token->rxgk->key.data = token->rxgk->_key;
> token->rxgk->ticket.len = raw_tktlen;
>
> + /* Check the enctype is supported. */
> + enc = crypto_krb5_find_enctype(token->rxgk->enctype);
> + if (!enc) {
> + ret = -ENOPKG;
> + goto reject_token;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Can this new -ENOPKG path leave prep->quotalen charged for memory that
was freed?
Earlier in rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() the whole token cost is added to
the quota before any of these checks run:
plen = sizeof(*token) + sizeof(*token->rxgk) + tktlen + keylen;
prep->quotalen += datalen + plen;
with tktlen bounded only by AFSTOKEN_GK_TOKEN_MAX (16384). The
reject_token label then does kfree(token->rxgk) and kfree(token) without
subtracting that amount again.
Every pre-existing reject path here returned -EKEYREJECTED, -EKEYEXPIRED
or -ENOMEM, and rxrpc_preparse_xdr() turns those into an abort:
switch (ret2) {
case 0:
ret = 0;
break;
case -EPROTONOSUPPORT:
break;
case -ENOPKG:
if (ret != 0)
ret = -ENOPKG;
break;
default:
ret = ret2;
goto error;
}
-ENOPKG is the soft case: if another token in the same payload (for
example an RXKAD token) parsed successfully, ret stays 0 and the key is
still instantiated, so __key_instantiate_and_link() ->
key_payload_reserve(key, prep->quotalen) commits the inflated value
against the owner's key quota:
security/keys/key.c:key_payload_reserve() {
...
if (delta > 0 &&
(key->user->qnbytes + delta > maxbytes ||
key->user->qnbytes + delta < key->user->qnbytes)) {
ret = -EDQUOT;
...
}
Since key_quota_maxbytes defaults to 20000 bytes, a single crafted
add_key("rxrpc", "afs@...", ...) payload containing one valid RXKAD token
plus an RxGK token with an unsupported enctype appears to be able to
charge roughly 16KB that is not actually held, making later add_key()
calls for that uid fail with -EDQUOT.
Would it be better to do the enctype lookup and key length check before
the prep->quotalen += datalen + plen accounting, or to subtract
datalen + plen on the -ENOPKG path?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260914151340.3227501-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 15:13 [PATCH net v10 00/14] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 01/14] rxrpc: Fix lack of short-send handling in rxrpc_kernel_send_data() David Howells
2026-09-14 21:11 ` David Laight
2026-09-17 16:01 ` David Howells
2026-09-15 13:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-17 16:00 ` David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 02/14] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 03/14] rxrpc: Fix aborting in rxperf test server David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 04/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 05/14] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 06/14] rxrpc: Fix error handling in rxrpc_send_data() David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 07/14] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 08/14] rxrpc: Fix double IRQ enablement David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 09/14] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 11/14] afs: Fix creation of RxGK CM channel token to have right size David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 12/14] afs: Fix lack of setting call->server when doing FS.InlineBulkStatus David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 13/14] afs: Fix uncleared op->call pointer David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 14/14] rxrpc: fix use-after-free in rxrpc_poke_conn() David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178951306345.22033.3166494756326322419@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.