From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: achender@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, nicoyip.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 04:36:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178953341168.22033.7134703325658795703@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912035027.27447-10-achender@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 2
- [Low] The commit fixes a reported, user-visible use-after-free (KASAN
slab-use-after-free in rds6_inc_info_copy() via rds_info_getsockopt(),…
- [Low] In rds_recv_incoming() (net/rds/recv.c), the cross-netns
rejection comment at lines 424-431 still states that netns teardown…
--
net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming
Every assignment of struct rds_incoming->i_conn now takes a connection
reference, so an inc parked on a socket receive queue (or an m_inc on a
send queue) keeps its connection allocated. The references are dropped
from rds_inc_put() and from a new rds_message_free() helper.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260720184955.3008978-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/
Two questions, one about the tag block and one about a comment that the
patch appears to make stale.
> Reported-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260720184955.3008978-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Sharath Srinivasan <sharath.srinivasan@oracle.com>
[Severity: Low]
Should this carry a Fixes: tag? The change closes a reported
slab-use-after-free (rds6_inc_info_copy() reached from
rds_info_getsockopt(), and the panic in rds_ib_recv_cache_put() reached
through rds_release()->rds_clear_recv_queue()->rds_ib_inc_free()), but no
originating commit is named.
git blame on the inc->i_conn = conn assignment in rds_inc_init() points at
bdbe6fbc6a2f ("RDS: recv.c"), so the origin looks identifiable. Other
patches in this series do carry the tag, for example "net/rds: make
rds_destroy_pending() cover single-connection destroy" with Fixes:
cdc306a5c9cd3 and "net/rds: guard every work-requeueing site with
rds_destroy_pending()" with Fixes: ebeeb1ad9b8a.
The commit message says in prose:
This is not a stable candidate: reaching the use-after-free requires
freeing a connection out from under a live socket
That reasoning is fine, but it is not something backport tooling parses,
and the tag block on its own does not say how far back the defect reaches.
> diff --git a/net/rds/recv.c b/net/rds/recv.c
> index 6204e577a90ae..b031c0b43af83 100644
> --- a/net/rds/recv.c
> +++ b/net/rds/recv.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ void rds_inc_init(struct rds_incoming *inc, struct rds_connection *conn,
> {
> refcount_set(&inc->i_refcount, 1);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inc->i_item);
> + rds_conn_get(conn); /* put in rds_inc_put() */
> inc->i_conn = conn;
> inc->i_conn_path = NULL;
> inc->i_saddr = *saddr;
[ ... ]
> @@ -325,6 +337,13 @@ void rds_recv_incoming(struct rds_connection *conn, struct in6_addr *saddr,
> unsigned long flags;
> struct rds_conn_path *cp;
>
> + /* every caller initialized @inc with rds_inc_init() or
> + * rds_inc_path_init() first, so i_conn already holds a reference.
> + * Take the new one before dropping the old, so that re-pointing an
> + * inc at the connection it already refers to cannot free it.
> + */
> + rds_conn_get(conn);
> + rds_conn_put(inc->i_conn);
> inc->i_conn = conn;
> inc->i_rx_jiffies = jiffies;
> if (conn->c_trans->t_mp_capable)
[Severity: Low]
Does this make the cross-netns comment further down in the same function
inaccurate? That comment still reads:
net/rds/recv.c:rds_recv_incoming() {
...
/*
* rds_find_bound() uses a global (netns-agnostic) hash table.
* An RDS connection created in netns A can match a socket bound
* in the init netns, delivering inc cross-netns with inc->i_conn
* pointing into netns A. When cleanup_net() then frees that conn,
* any subsequent dereference of inc->i_conn is a use-after-free.
* Drop the inc if the receiving socket lives in a different netns.
*/
if (!net_eq(sock_net(rds_rs_to_sk(rs)), rds_conn_net(conn))) {
...
}
After this patch the inc owns a reference from rds_inc_init() or
rds_inc_path_init(), and rds_inc_put() releases it only after
->inc_free() has run:
conn->c_trans->inc_free(inc);
rds_conn_put(conn);
rds_conn_put() reaches kmem_cache_free() only when the kref hits zero, so
a cross-netns inc sitting on a receive queue keeps its connection
allocated across cleanup_net().
The check itself still looks wanted, since cross-netns delivery is wrong on
its own and an outliving conn leaves conn->c_net stale. Could the comment
be reworded to state that reason rather than a use-after-free this patch
removes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260912035027.27447-1-achender%40kernel.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 3:50 [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] net/rds: make connection lifetime reference-counted Allison Henderson
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] net/rds: guard every work-requeueing site with rds_destroy_pending() Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] net/rds: make rds_destroy_pending() cover single-connection destroy Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] net/rds: split connection destroy into quiesce and kref-governed free Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] net/rds: wait for connections to be freed on transport unload Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] net/rds: unlink transport nodes before a possibly deferred connection free Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net/rds: hold connection references in lookup, sockets and c_passive Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] net/rds: pin the connection across RDMA-CM event handling Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming Allison Henderson
2026-09-13 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 4:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178953341168.22033.7134703325658795703@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.