From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Rajesh Venkatasubramanian <vrajesh@umich.edu>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178970000.1082049291@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404151752210.9569-100000@localhost.localdomain>
>> > Any ideas how we might handle latency from vmtruncate (and
>> > try_to_unmap) if using prio_tree with i_shared_lock spinlock?
>>
>> I've been thinking about that. My rough plan is to go wild, naked and lockless.
>> If we arrange things in the correct order, new entries onto the list would
>
> It's quite easy if there's a list - though I'm not that eager to go wild,
> naked and lockless with you! But what if there's a prio_tree?
I still think my list-of-lists patch fixes the original problem, and is
simpler ... I'll try to get it updated, and sent out.
M.,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-04 12:33 [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree Hugh Dickins
2004-04-09 20:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-09 21:31 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-09 21:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-09 23:17 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-09 21:51 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-09 22:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-09 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-11 16:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-11 17:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 4:32 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-12 5:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-12 18:58 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-12 19:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 19:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-12 19:38 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-12 21:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-12 21:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-14 20:18 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-15 0:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 0:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-15 3:40 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-15 6:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-15 10:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-15 12:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 15:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-15 16:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-15 17:14 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2004-04-15 17:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-15 18:42 ` Dave McCracken
[not found] ` <192710000.1082052992@flay>
2004-04-15 18:47 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-15 22:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 22:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 13:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 14:41 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178970000.1082049291@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vrajesh@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.