From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: lorenzo@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
ae878000@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: airoha: npu: cancel wdt_work after releasing the WDT IRQ
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:30:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179021702008.1285615.10214789929001458933.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922000914.542068-1-mhun512@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:09:14 -0400 you wrote:
> airoha_npu_remove() calls cancel_work_sync() on each core's wdt_work,
> but the watchdog IRQ that queues it is requested with devm_request_irq()
> and is freed only after .remove() returns. airoha_npu_wdt_handler() can
> therefore schedule_work() again once the cancel has returned. struct
> airoha_npu, which contains the work, is devm_kzalloc()'d and is freed in
> that same unwind, so the late work dereferences freed memory.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: airoha: npu: cancel wdt_work after releasing the WDT IRQ
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4bdee8060d1e
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 0:09 [PATCH net] net: airoha: npu: cancel wdt_work after releasing the WDT IRQ Myeonghun Pak
2026-09-22 8:15 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-22 8:42 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-24 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179021702008.1285615.10214789929001458933.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=ae878000@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.