All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 2/6] GFS2: Check gfs2_rgrp_used_recently inside gfs2_rgrp_congested
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:48:28 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1790622865.7035793.1516031308861.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9314101d-6f0f-2f42-660c-dd6641d07f0d@redhat.com>

Hi,

----- Original Message -----
| Hi,
| 
| 
| On 10/01/18 20:42, Bob Peterson wrote:
| > Function gfs2_rgrp_congested is called in two places: once before
| > we acquire the rgrp glock, and once after. The first time, it checks
| > to see if the rgrp was used recently because the usage statistics
| > are only valid in short-term. For the second call, that check was
| > not done, but should have been, for the same reason.
| >
| > This patch simply moves function gfs2_rgrp_used_recently before
| > function gfs2_rgrp_congested, and it's now called from there so
| > it applies equally to both checks.
| I don't think this makes sense. The purpose of the
| gfs2_rgrp_used_recently test is that when we don't hold the glock we
| might not have up to date stats to make decisions from, so we check that
| we've held the lock recently enough that we can use historical
| statistics. Once we hold the lock however, then we can be sure that the
| stats are up to date, as the process of acquiring the lock will bring
| them up to date, so why repeat the test when we already have the lock?
| 
| Steve.

Hm. I'll admit it's been a long time since I revisited this patch set,
but you've got a valid point. This makes no sense. I'll pull this patch.

Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems



  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-15 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10 20:42 [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 0/6] [resend] GFS2: Rework rgrp glock congestion functions for intra-node Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 1/6] GFS2: Simplify gfs2_rgrp_used_recently Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 2/6] GFS2: Check gfs2_rgrp_used_recently inside gfs2_rgrp_congested Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 10:45   ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-15 15:48     ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 3/6] GFS2: Refactor function fast_to_acquire Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 10:51   ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-15 16:00     ` Bob Peterson
2018-01-15 16:24     ` Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 4/6] GFS2: Simplify by checking fast_to_acquire in gfs2_rgrp_congested Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 10:55   ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 5/6] GFS2: Split gfs2_rgrp_congested into dlm and non-dlm cases Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 6/6] GFS2: Add checks for intra-node congestion Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 11:11   ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-11 15:52 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 0/6] [resend] GFS2: Rework rgrp glock congestion functions for intra-node Abhijith Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1790622865.7035793.1516031308861.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.