From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Cc: Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, daniel.machon@microchip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, error27@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: microchip: vcap: stop scanning after deleting key field
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:30:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179076060478.1357769.13599525229018760574.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925063937.963430-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:39:36 -0700 you wrote:
> The only call outside the KUnit tests is in
> sparx5_tc_add_rule_copy(), which passes a fixed key list with no
> duplicate entries. Therefore, the potential double-free is not
> currently reachable in tree.
>
> However, vcap_filter_rule_keys() is exported and does not require its
> key list entries to be unique. If a future or external caller supplies
> the same key at another position that the inner loop visits, it calls
> list_del() and kfree() a second time on the freed field, leading to a
> potential double-free.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- net: microchip: vcap: stop scanning after deleting key field
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/99b43ede9e35
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 6:39 [PATCH] net: microchip: vcap: stop scanning after deleting key field Harshit Mogalapalli
2026-09-25 13:06 ` Daniel Machon
2026-09-30 9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179076060478.1357769.13599525229018760574.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.