From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
Cc: andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com,
david.lebrun@uclouvain.be, amsalam20@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] seg6: fix HMAC validation when an extension header precedes the SRH
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:10:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179085300802.2398446.15616903843464042214.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926-b4-seg6-hmac-transport-header-v2-1-8087b76f6375@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 20:19:27 +0900 you wrote:
> seg6_hmac_validate_skb() derived the SRH from skb_transport_header().
> That only holds while the two coincide, which is not true on the
> seg6_local input path.
>
> ip6_rcv_core() leaves the transport header just past the IPv6 header.
> A Hop-by-Hop options header is consumed before the route lookup and
> advances it, but a Destination Options header is not: the seg6_local
> lwtunnel is entered through an input redirect from the route lookup,
> which bypasses the extension header handlers. The transport header
> then still points at the Destination Options header while
> seg6_get_srh() has located the real SRH further down the chain.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] seg6: fix HMAC validation when an extension header precedes the SRH
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f9cb4d296d81
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-26 11:19 [PATCH net v2] seg6: fix HMAC validation when an extension header precedes the SRH Yuya Kusakabe
2026-09-29 0:09 ` Andrea Mayer
2026-10-01 10:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-01 11:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179085300802.2398446.15616903843464042214.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=amsalam20@gmail.com \
--cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.lebrun@uclouvain.be \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.