From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Shubham Antil <shubham@octane.security>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, achender@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, andy.grover@oracle.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gio@octane.security,
tjdqudcks0424@naver.com, robert@octane.security,
paolo@octane.security, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] RDS/IB: validate receive fragment completions
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:10:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179211660497.15365.17816447060855250887.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013025729.40815-1-shubham@octane.security>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:27:29 +0530 you wrote:
> rds_ib_process_recv() accounts every receive fragment as contributing
> min(i_recv_data_rem, RDS_FRAG_SIZE) bytes, regardless of the completion
> length. When a completion is shorter than the header-declared amount,
> receive accounting can advance beyond the payload supplied by the
> completion.
>
> Only an IB_WC_RECV completion has the buffer layout expected by this
> receive path. Other successful completion opcodes must not be interpreted
> as ordinary receive completions.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v4] RDS/IB: validate receive fragment completions
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/65cf6863606b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 2:57 [PATCH net v4] RDS/IB: validate receive fragment completions Shubham Antil
2026-10-13 3:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 2:15 ` Allison Henderson
2026-10-16 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179211660497.15365.17816447060855250887.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.grover@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gio@octane.security \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paolo@octane.security \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=robert@octane.security \
--cc=shubham@octane.security \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tjdqudcks0424@naver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.