From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0562960820D6 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=beta header.b=CVe2ZFIp; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=XxQ9gl6s; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=gWn3CqS5; dkim=neutral header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=adzmqr5S DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id: MIME-Version:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=23QSXUcxpJ9I+8LmSsOwRmorYZECN3yWg5P2kYKcCQ4=; b=CVe2ZFIpR4TUWTgFHytR7vUSFV zOdWUqajGS00ZQg/9027ePfwawAafXktXY6CqIRVFx9n8vvUK/JqyuC9XjQIyj2oifzvk2ux4xJpc xgTLIogov2H89eRrxaxMTo0EP0UqbjUlDxs2bTvCxAsqq5wgyLSah4qud+//njPzeMKU=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1xIpTW-0001J0-DR; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:31 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1xIpTF-0001IZ-TR for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id:From: Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iZJHrYGA4vvk72TfCN2wk/iV+4PmycnQTPaBgYupmAA=; b=XxQ9gl6sHNMmo0WA3lUgIRbtew 6KVceP87LxkNJRTR7o9NlT9JQelktHqBCyuz8XweXXfpYpS7Tiq5kByRPbt8GiqTROX57ZHhnjKp6 rDOV+02xJtsq1aYZ5oM5t7Z7CihPyNB1IhifG99TYqct3fEiSRHF9ZImUNWBNVLatn1s=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iZJHrYGA4vvk72TfCN2wk/iV+4PmycnQTPaBgYupmAA=; b=gWn3CqS5mqA/orSOUfJcUSWtaJ /xoKkWhXKZuoUdXmPM2gHtjD+VrUSEw6bhXsgI2xSYr+f6GNu/0iMHP4LvHle1Z3U47lbWX4v137f 2Vm4BR7ENojy6fTnsgDZn0Dzps7auHfEPpVAOMEcCMFWaQ8DbBJoH7L28Qv0rMy+GnaM=; Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1xIpTB-0003jS-VK for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5056460D93; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0674D1F000C4; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792424408; bh=iZJHrYGA4vvk72TfCN2wk/iV+4PmycnQTPaBgYupmAA=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=adzmqr5SCl8jrlV8Gr5UMACGuhiZR2Burf8qeoQ1FN+Vh9ByqsAT/VS+cpnVB/D4z xSziBi0lxrRZh3LC4loOFAl3X7G2yQPNIhQMYxQgHWgn2gcFNDr8U5SKkrREety1L7 Ajh/NRgyR0mPQ0zVYS7M0fFwJrPdzY4e9xX5C9Q8ijP/tF3rLIzHgP4x8/eN3isY/2 7j0U/tRt0PYA+U/IlBXdvfMtxGgcjeXOfPYEFEa+s9PBgVYoxj8KSUohxXuVr6Y35o /2XlCuGNIUI+FM231su1k0shpe1xwhWACWk6aiUEJuR/RVT+OO38mxhyE/+TphMqcX XpaIrSCVoKWYQ== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15983811A71; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <179242440678.2714099.1586605259418361333.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:40:06 +0000 References: <20260911143549.909867-1-daeho43@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20260911143549.909867-1-daeho43@gmail.com> To: Daeho Jeong X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Headers-End: 1xIpTB-0003jS-VK Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: use BIT_ULL for mount option bitmasks X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org Cc: lkp@intel.com, daehojeong@google.com, kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 Hello: This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev) by Jaegeuk Kim : On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 07:35:48 -0700 you wrote: > From: Daeho Jeong > > Although f2fs_mount_info.opt and f2fs_fs_context.opt_mask are declared as > unsigned long long (64 bits), the option bit manipulation macros > (clear_opt, set_opt, test_opt) and context helpers (ctx_set_opt, > ctx_clear_opt, ctx_test_opt) use BIT(), which expands to (UL(1) << nr). > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [f2fs-dev,v2,1/2] f2fs: use BIT_ULL for mount option bitmasks https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/a5388dd98954 - [f2fs-dev,v2,2/2] f2fs: introduce reserve_shrink mount option for filesystem shrinkage (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel