From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E7F2606A31A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=beta header.b=ND3tmitl; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=LhqQbMgl; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=Sq5+Pv68; dkim=neutral header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=KIzfmbI8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id: MIME-Version:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Owner; bh=bY5IQ9Gw+i4a7wB7v4Q95GgZTS2QvsUrp0OXk1Okee8=; b=ND3tmitle3RDQu jYy7cW455lvt/z647ujIB8/4iSs8+nwsSyHQJE7OdzasrmeKiA+M6dOF3mfklvO1/iuT6lUld4Va+ D5l5b3tfLFwJpidbSiCE1+acxojzhtxyiDhMHwsIU3zzI9VHeJbrJRZ3Oez+9gOzYHz3RCSP20ELr o34=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xLMoQ-000000000rG-09Mt; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:38 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xLMo3-000000000qn-3YMC for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id:From: Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NwOaDW3IKFzrSo7Bh0MMRKLfKzgUJTqf3sxAkLkKUf8=; b=LhqQbMglfb04Nidy+kcOSYdEu/ pSprYGEd/MoMXTa7hjDVwXsS32knUlPDecnktmyX1oYn+3Kp/429TGj/swBzfMyd4L/8r4URWEQii Z1ckAgAK3lhMbB3i8joEBXr3cWZpSkjFdZnvSV7LK5NTeJ6RyNO5dSnCxR4c70QyHQFE=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NwOaDW3IKFzrSo7Bh0MMRKLfKzgUJTqf3sxAkLkKUf8=; b=Sq5+Pv68YCbWF1lW13/eU3Becn Dl5oqX4JtiZHvMU8vJv9Qom/qAy2fxEwJI4CwtnxGQ37YfI8wMP4wzn1p1tIFNpgivZlXfXsP+owc UlOB0WEdhaXqAifVZTUVkAJEYVerb/1JpuWDzsBDqB1rarGxASMa8hPMqQ3irukbS17Q=; Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.100.1) id 1xLMo1-000000005S1-3rp9 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F8D601F9 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10C311F01828; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793029208; bh=NwOaDW3IKFzrSo7Bh0MMRKLfKzgUJTqf3sxAkLkKUf8=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=KIzfmbI8bz/CC45PT3r57JDhBQ+qYzAmmt6vUSKytYx3SSomQAtBT3dX1/5GAex2o AjxsLl6gTjASosPOFCp2CpLXwhBzlMvzGCYFqquBZNXDRnrX6zeHdjuNopNu5lsLWV 0mFiBWh9CUHoET9QBhtJNrbl2OAXSggecwPmwYmKx/0/s7M9TNTyswUuGUUQGRrgg6 s0bse5GDXktDjxYv/fPtz8dYdSsuHFHorAPsf72vRb5qFiDudU6Dn4yMVU1oqTo+bA W1MsdBYEeurgFgSOTepGgbC3SXmnLZ6IIKvUlWCBVAjtA2QrXWFaFmZ3UN6PY8yPxR yTiQQfXTuyQag== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0741939EF95E; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <179302920657.3239427.10043176302785058573.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:40:06 +0000 References: <20261026002350.1451587-1-chao@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261026002350.1451587-1-chao@kernel.org> To: Chao Yu X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Headers-End: 1xLMo1-000000005S1-3rp9 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to fetch ino via ino_of_node() under cache lock X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 Hello: This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev) by Jaegeuk Kim : On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:23:49 +0800 you wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > In f2fs_writeback_node_caches(), it's better to fetch ino via ino_of_node() > under cache lock, otherwise, node cache content may become stale after cache > is unlocked due to racing w/ truncation. > > Commit 493b9dc8b52c ("f2fs: cache: use node cache") fixes similar issue in > f2fs_flush_inline_data() introduced in commit 34c061ad85a2 ("f2fs: Avoid double > lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint"). > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [f2fs-dev,v2,1/2] f2fs: fix to fetch ino via ino_of_node() under cache lock https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/cd6d8b189139 - [f2fs-dev,v2,2/2] f2fs: fix to update superblock crc in sanity_check_area_boundary() https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/f8f956c7ec8c You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel