From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Cc: horatiu.vultur@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: release the in-flight slot of a stale TX skb
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 22:30:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179314020694.360855.7049106598198872614.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026-lan966x-ptp-stale-tx-slot-v1-1-9f7c895eb1ff@microchip.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 14:46:54 +0100 you wrote:
> lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request() counts every two step TX skb waiting for
> its timestamp in lan966x->ptp_skbs, and refuses new ones once
> LAN966X_MAX_PTP_ID are in flight. lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_old_release()
> frees the skbs that have waited longer than LAN966X_PTP_TIMEOUT.
>
> Before this patch, old_release() does not decrement ptp_skbs, so every
> skb whose timestamp never arrives, for example because the switch
> discarded the frame, keeps its slot forever. Once LAN966X_MAX_PTP_ID
> slots are lost, two step frames fail to transmit on every port of the
> switch.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: lan966x: release the in-flight slot of a stale TX skb
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/074caa30a627
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 13:46 [PATCH net] net: lan966x: release the in-flight slot of a stale TX skb Daniel Machon
2026-10-27 13:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 14:09 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-27 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179314020694.360855.7049106598198872614.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.