From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793203897; b=eVv+5yAO9JEOarNkV6hp6a/bAw7WNTHRcE5e0k0GIydif0c5bUtoQj9dJML5Rwr5L51i MqPBBbtGR4MCsFchtnr6ATwd5cS1YXwIUr8O1p/WN2Sr6rKVnGTC7CyCwKiUM1MI+Riyk d2S/ie876KdrXdFs0uidjdmhDosQWvdkHHGZ0Pu9gEnxByg1h7ESPcJTC/o+zBseXbFiU SDsWsJ/pV8S0pay3xkYDhivfyOUA0FtVyDAPJWLa7u0P9K5zPKDk+AfjDTeNmcohRVP4U ZP7Qnbp+1Lmp8rU+5Cfu29xsSoFvS+/W1YyeOL4ATCvIGeh18y4sIcQCxihNOK8zVbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793203897; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=l7JM6kjEbmJMGR/DijPPNFztqWlH/SKeZbpLRpj6UamerRkSNJDUP+r95vH5mp7+SNMU RDpfLBdDvbJObZGfMh/srKIApjLLL1XQ5IvQBVHEtITYaKKDxR/oAfY9o5p+esamqRTh+ JkKeZQGDCDv/IvlWwPKEK03tEuflGa1uFcYDyqwxz+0sTaCI67O4hPmOTeOymFQm3eFHE ga5bqDFOICCGzYDGAvPWYAkv0lVICq/0SUICUFPgRa/I09ilmY0an4ZA/7P9ztNN8dLvK haasPemE570pttWehypFbxzb6Xwp7OXAU1TLXJVNAhKht2zeGMALlTFBJUnC+jhTDTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="BV/K2dx9"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18184606A31A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=BV/K2dx9 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DB5B1F01300; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:11:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793203896; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=BV/K2dx9Q8ujw2RoRkX6z8Ba7ckQ4vbewOGfzKH1oeYTR7IgcJOQ0YQTwmMmJc3tp evXskE4++0Yw34VluvIZDOu2oJ3FWBtrOs6C+2wgDrNKG4o87UprrsHdhg6RsTERUl k+te+DgqB/5l+yQYvm2EvDtmnOxyb5Jg7KJT8woQ2xiZs3nFsUcOkMBVIORAMLqUmW tgJUvBrtOE9QWKEDAXgaR/xGliNalEYo1/jpsWaR0Txc75WTdlu5Ke2tCWUnccyn02 xIeGfnVky63WKviYYINps07lVe+5s1kq686jfw+63XH/VCgrWT+uVv+DSxcbmu4ejW 2LHXLRiCMSU+A== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Neal Cardwell , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Zeng Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: avoid double destroy in tcp_abort() of an unaccepted child Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:11:35 +0000 Message-ID: <179320389561.3327.248054156447524630@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261028160847.2170959-1-edumazet@kernel.org> References: <20261028160847.2170959-1-edumazet@kernel.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.