From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] docs: trace: Warn against using printk() in probe handlers
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 16:11:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179360348516.115681.16358304979974648339.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179360345418.115681.193455787480210412.stgit@devnote2>
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Probe handlers (kprobes, kretprobes, and fprobes) execute in atomic or
non-preemptible contexts. Because handlers do not run in NMI context
(especially when jump-optimized or ftrace-based), calling printk()
directly can attempt to synchronously acquire console driver locks or
scheduler locks (via console_unlock()), risking a deadlock if the probed
or interrupted context already holds those locks.
Document this restriction in both kprobes.rst and fprobe.rst, and
recommend using trace_printk() instead to safely log messages to the
ftrace buffer.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/trace/fprobe.rst | 5 +++++
Documentation/trace/kprobes.rst | 11 +++++++++--
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/fprobe.rst b/Documentation/trace/fprobe.rst
index 46dd46a97c1f..72e0fd9e1808 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/fprobe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/fprobe.rst
@@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ handler.
If the entry callback function returns !0, the corresponding exit callback
will be cancelled.
+Since the callbacks run with preemption disabled under ftrace recursion
+protection, calling printk() or pr_*() from these callbacks is not safe
+and can cause deadlocks on console driver or scheduler locks. Use
+trace_printk() instead to log debugging output.
+
@fp
This is the address of `fprobe` data structure related to this handler.
You can embed the `fprobe` to your data structure and get it by
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/kprobes.rst b/Documentation/trace/kprobes.rst
index 5e606730cec6..19c04a91a664 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/kprobes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/kprobes.rst
@@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ course, has no way to distinguish the deliberately injected faults
from the accidental ones. Don't drink and probe.
Kprobes makes no attempt to prevent probe handlers from stepping on
-each other -- e.g., probing printk() and then calling printk() from a
-probe handler. If a probe handler hits a probe, that second probe's
+each other -- e.g., probing trace_printk() and then calling trace_printk()
+from a probe handler. If a probe handler hits a probe, that second probe's
handlers won't be run in that instance, and the kprobe.nmissed member
of the second probe will be incremented.
@@ -579,6 +579,13 @@ which depends on the architecture and optimization state. (e.g.,
kretprobe handlers and optimized kprobe handlers run without interrupt
disabled on x86/x86-64). In any case, your handler should not yield
the CPU (e.g., by attempting to acquire a semaphore, or waiting I/O).
+Furthermore, probe handlers should avoid calling printk() or pr_*().
+Because probe handlers execute in atomic/non-preemptible contexts without
+being in NMI context (especially when jump-optimized or ftrace-based),
+calling printk() may attempt to synchronously acquire console driver locks
+or scheduler locks via console_unlock(), risking a deadlock if the probed
+or interrupted context already holds those locks. Use trace_printk()
+instead to safely output messages to the trace buffer.
Since a return probe is implemented by replacing the return
address with the trampoline's address, stack backtraces and calls
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 7:10 [PATCH 0/3] probes: Use trace_printk() in probe handlers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-02 7:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] samples/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-02 7:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] samples/fprobe: Use trace_printk() and trace_dump_stack() Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-02 7:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [this message]
2026-11-02 17:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] probes: Use trace_printk() in probe handlers Steven Rostedt
2026-11-02 22:01 ` John Ogness
2026-11-03 2:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-03 11:11 ` Petr Mladek
2026-11-03 14:09 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179360348516.115681.16358304979974648339.stgit@devnote2 \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.