From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: DPDK on Xen maintenance Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1795705.pPV7SVCssA@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: huawei.xie@intel.com, Jan Blunck , huilongx.xu@intel.com, Thiago Martins To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5B72A5F for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f65so93849134wmi.0 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi all, We are facing some issues with Xen dom0. Some were fixed in RC2: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/043760.html and there still have some other issues. It seems Xen is becoming less attractive: - we do not have a lot of test reports or feedbacks - there is no maintainer for DPDK on Xen - we are still waiting for the Xen netfront PMD I wonder wether it still makes sense to maintain this code or not? In case of positive reply, it would be nice to have the name of someone responsible for this code, i.e. a maintainer. Thanks