From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: move rel_notes instructions as comments Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 16:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1796854.0EgLBIVWVR@xps13> References: <1463146079-7607-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Mcnamara, John" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA029ABA for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a17so138575686wme.0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:16:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi John, > Reviewed-by: John McNamara > Acked-by: John McNamara The meaning of Reviewed-by and Acked-by can be slightly different but I don't think we need to put both. In this case, as the doc maintainer, your ack should be fine. By the way, I'm totally OK to discuss a better description of these tags in the guidelines.