From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: DPDK.org Community Call - Sept 24 - Discuss Growth,
	Improvements
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:36:58 +0200
Message-ID: <1806720.jzdZcVXP9E@xps13>
References: <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E94B1A7@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <560312E3.8070605@redhat.com>
 <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E9522E0@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "St Leger, Jim" <jim.st.leger@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988E98E58
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so239372733wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 01:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E9522E0@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-09-23 23:56, St Leger, Jim:
> This call is aimed to get more open dialogue in the community.

I wonder how a call can "get more open dialogue"?
Because of being "live", a lot of people cannot attend at this time.
A call is also a place where only people having the strongest voice will be heard.
Finally it will be really well understood only by english-native people
(depending on the accent of speakers).

I know only one way to be really open and we are using it for this discussion.