From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Sven Eckelmann Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:31:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1807277.5c8tsCoh5a@bentobox> In-Reply-To: References: <1479688779-1328-1-git-send-email-fgao@ikuai8.com> <1926952.1nDu9mPud9@bentobox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH net 1/1] net: batman-adv: Treat NET_XMIT_CN as transmit successfully List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Feng Gao Cc: mareklindner@neomailbox.ch, Linux Kernel Network Developers , b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, a@unstable.cc, "David S. Miller" --nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote: > >> From: Gao Feng > >> > >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but > >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan, > > > > s/packe/packet/ > > What's this mean? That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when applied only to the commit message) would fix it. David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not. Kind regards, Sven --nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJYMrDIAAoJEF2HCgfBJntGkCoP/iLihrMfC5ifPWFVzSmuh8N0 f9f+HlAj+uWYQ8EagEWkvTMEIIE1is0TkuQzA9MjvmYSyqYsHM4qxYUqSlzkGIaQ qxVlI6ZqhaezStOrLNj9+sP8KW7aZ4xLQKSt/sV6rXY3IUhqFY4F4dwZ1JWOAzM6 73z9iB7mYv9qjCdtvCccRNfeWonGapPlnqaXm+rS/J6angNd8xh3PngXLqEpOYsW LLW6QfCLi+aYAWk5gCJwjtN8d87jkSNmRe6XUNwP0ZLF5uE5IJPGh+zMtJY+yibr OlkksDMA8NPbkjgMHlheGexP8KgP53GjcSDukklC6hMm4eR7hMNoWvfAIXeUNHpM OAaHMmKHC7Ii0fioPq5UWpM7yUZCdYVSImIatTHJsHKSWKmfkiggFoQ819b8axp/ NPay7+JlXm4NsAYwPPiUssidFz8NcqpWabY0XTwI+RfHbUqu2Cg8wf4t+3lbmMzk kA+Bk93pbicAP6Z5o7dfRYbZUhsW/9ByZhvSFG7RsdFX1eGdTqz1j8Q3SkPlKG0X n6c5f/xIOkgjdo7ySlrPaGpE4DaAHR4Q3HYLJSlQI74782t8d3hY1okeTk0wtRc+ onuR/LjkqwuSzAER4KuKJavrSRk5+APhTP/wCOrKCvmw7D2AI6opZWwznbj//RkW 1nx88TtceOKfvc3/9tC1 =dj3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Eckelmann Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: batman-adv: Treat NET_XMIT_CN as transmit successfully Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:31:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1807277.5c8tsCoh5a@bentobox> References: <1479688779-1328-1-git-send-email-fgao@ikuai8.com> <1926952.1nDu9mPud9@bentobox> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: mareklindner-rVWd3aGhH2z5bpWLKbzFeg@public.gmane.org, Linux Kernel Network Developers , b.a.t.m.a.n-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, a@unstable.cc, "David S. Miller" To: Feng Gao Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: b.a.t.m.a.n-bounces-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Sender: "B.A.T.M.A.N" List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao-KlmEoCYek3zQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org wrote: > >> From: Gao Feng > >> > >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but > >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan, > > > > s/packe/packet/ > > What's this mean? That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when applied only to the commit message) would fix it. David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not. Kind regards, Sven --nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJYMrDIAAoJEF2HCgfBJntGkCoP/iLihrMfC5ifPWFVzSmuh8N0 f9f+HlAj+uWYQ8EagEWkvTMEIIE1is0TkuQzA9MjvmYSyqYsHM4qxYUqSlzkGIaQ qxVlI6ZqhaezStOrLNj9+sP8KW7aZ4xLQKSt/sV6rXY3IUhqFY4F4dwZ1JWOAzM6 73z9iB7mYv9qjCdtvCccRNfeWonGapPlnqaXm+rS/J6angNd8xh3PngXLqEpOYsW LLW6QfCLi+aYAWk5gCJwjtN8d87jkSNmRe6XUNwP0ZLF5uE5IJPGh+zMtJY+yibr OlkksDMA8NPbkjgMHlheGexP8KgP53GjcSDukklC6hMm4eR7hMNoWvfAIXeUNHpM OAaHMmKHC7Ii0fioPq5UWpM7yUZCdYVSImIatTHJsHKSWKmfkiggFoQ819b8axp/ NPay7+JlXm4NsAYwPPiUssidFz8NcqpWabY0XTwI+RfHbUqu2Cg8wf4t+3lbmMzk kA+Bk93pbicAP6Z5o7dfRYbZUhsW/9ByZhvSFG7RsdFX1eGdTqz1j8Q3SkPlKG0X n6c5f/xIOkgjdo7ySlrPaGpE4DaAHR4Q3HYLJSlQI74782t8d3hY1okeTk0wtRc+ onuR/LjkqwuSzAER4KuKJavrSRk5+APhTP/wCOrKCvmw7D2AI6opZWwznbj//RkW 1nx88TtceOKfvc3/9tC1 =dj3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1632388.DNzhomgMjo--