From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Laird Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/busybox In-Reply-To: <20080627120011.GD32468@mx.loc> References: <20080626065112.3F4CB3C289@busybox.net> <877iccn0ml.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <18151015.post@talk.nabble.com> <87y74ri68u.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20080627120011.GD32468@mx.loc> Message-ID: <18154265.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net The main reason I do this is that I use ELDK-4.0 for part of the system. Changing the compiler for that part of the system is not possible(easy) due to prebuilt binaries. However ELDK-4.0 creates a problem with busybox 1.9.X (I will try again with 1.10.X and 1.11.X). It incorrectly strips some symbol (xstroll if I remember) The end result being that busybox will not start as there is an undefined symbol. (init fails) The problem does not exist in 1.2.2.1 and does not exist if I use GCC4.2.1 based compilers. However I cannot easily replace compiler so for now have stuck with 1.2.2.1. I did not raise the issue on mailing lists as I am trying to move compilers and thus make the problem go away. However that takes time and I would rather that buildroot marked things as deprecated for now instead of removing support. Cheers Dan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/svn-commit%3A-trunk-buildroot-package-busybox-tp18127574p18154265.html Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.