From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: correct description of attach to indirect mbuf Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 18:08:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1815752.S474otfYhx@xps13> References: <824b47fc043902610646e26a8b053199620744da.1481012725.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20161206111105.g6u2bjbhcgnl5kfs@tarshish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" , Olivier Matz To: Baruch Siach Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3912BA8 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 18:08:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t79so133580532wmt.0 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 09:08:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > > Thanks, please keep the doc fixes coming. > > > > > > It would be better to quote the function in fixed width text like: > > > ``rte_pktmbuf_attach()``. > > > > None of the function names mentioned in this chapter are quoted. I can > > post a fix for that, but I think it should be a separate patch. > > > > Unfortunately, the documentation isn't very consistent in this. You can > ignore it for this patch. > > Acked-by: John McNamara Applied, thanks