Re: [PATCH 09/14] android/handsfree-client: Add support to get operator name

[Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>]

Hi Łukasz,

On Wednesday 12 of November 2014 11:49:32 Lukasz Rymanowski wrote:
> ---
>  android/handsfree-client.c | 58
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 56
> insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/android/handsfree-client.c b/android/handsfree-client.c
> index c710b48..2931c5c 100644
> --- a/android/handsfree-client.c
> +++ b/android/handsfree-client.c
> @@ -603,10 +603,26 @@ done:
> 
>  static void handle_query_operator_name(const void *buf, uint16_t len)
>  {
> -	DBG("Not Implemented");
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	uint8_t status;
> +
> +	DBG("");
> +
> +	dev = find_default_device();
> +	if (!dev) {
> +		status = HAL_STATUS_FAILED;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (hfp_hf_send_command(dev->hf, cmd_complete_cb, NULL, "AT+COPS?"))
> +		status = HAL_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> +	else
> +		status = HAL_STATUS_FAILED;
> +
> +done:
>  	ipc_send_rsp(hal_ipc, HAL_SERVICE_ID_HANDSFREE_CLIENT,
>  					HAL_OP_HF_CLIENT_QUERY_OPERATOR_NAME,
> -					HAL_STATUS_UNSUPPORTED);
> +					status);
>  }
> 
>  static void handle_retrieve_subscr_info(const void *buf, uint16_t len)
> @@ -857,6 +873,43 @@ static void ciev_cb(struct hfp_context *context, void
> *user_data) }
>  }
> 
> +static void cops_cb(struct hfp_context *context, void *user_data)
> +{
> +	uint8_t buf[IPC_MTU];
> +	struct hal_ev_hf_client_operator_name *ev = (void *) buf;
> +	char name[17];
> +	uint32_t format;

unsigned int

> +
> +	DBG("");
> +
> +	if (!context) {
> +		error("hf-client: incorrect COPS response");
> +		return;
> +	}

Not needed.

> +
> +	/* Not interested in mode */
> +	hfp_context_skip_field(context);
> +
> +	if (!hfp_context_get_number(context, &format))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (format != 0)
> +		info("hf-client: Not correct string format in +COSP");
> +
> +	if (!hfp_context_get_string(context, name, sizeof(name))) {
> +		error("hf-client: incorrect COPS response");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));

This memset is not really needed since all relevant data is later overwritten.
Maybe just extract name directly to ev->name?

> +	ev->name_len = strlen(name) + 1;
> +	memcpy(ev->name, name, ev->name_len);
> +
> +	ipc_send_notif(hal_ipc, HAL_SERVICE_ID_HANDSFREE_CLIENT,
> +					HAL_EV_HF_CLIENT_OPERATOR_NAME,
> +					sizeof(*ev) + ev->name_len, ev);
> +}
> +
>  static void slc_completed(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -884,6 +937,7 @@ static void slc_completed(struct device *dev)
>  	hfp_hf_register(dev->hf, brth_cb, "+BTRH", dev, NULL);
>  	hfp_hf_register(dev->hf, clcc_cb, "+CLCC", dev, NULL);
>  	hfp_hf_register(dev->hf, ciev_cb, "+CIEV", dev, NULL);
> +	hfp_hf_register(dev->hf, cops_cb, "+COPS", dev, NULL);
>  }
> 
>  static void slc_chld_cb(struct hfp_context *context, void *user_data)

-- 
BR
Szymon Janc