From: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: atmel nand bindings vs. actual dts files
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:07:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1823900.qPX5mxbl1h@ada> (raw)
Hei hei,
I'm currently adapting the at91-sama5d27_som1_ek.dts file for a custom
modification of that board [1], and had a look at how sama5d3.dtsi,
sama5d4.dtsi and boards including those define the nand controller and the
nand chip. What puzzles me is the following. The atmel-nand devicetree binding
docs say:
Required properties:
- reg: describes the CS lines assigned to the NAND device. If the NAND device
exposes multiple CS lines (multi-dies chips), your reg property will
contain X tuples of 3 entries.
1st entry: the CS line this NAND chip is connected to
2nd entry: the base offset of the memory region assigned to this
device (always 0)
3rd entry: the memory region size (always 0x800000)
However the actual node of e.g. at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts contains this:
nand@3 {
reg = <0x3 0x0 0x2>;
atmel,rb = <0>;
nand-bus-width = <8>;
nand-ecc-mode = "hw";
nand-ecc-strength = <4>;
nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
nand-on-flash-bbt;
So instead of "always 0x800000" that node has 0x2 as third entry for the 'reg'
property. Why is that?
Bonus question: if the R/B line is not connected, how is that expressed in
dts? As far as I understood that is possible, if the driver polls some status
register instead of that line level, right?
Greets
Alex
[1] we piggyback soldered a raw NAND flash to the som1 module with some
enameled copper wire for evaluation, NAND is already responding in a modified
U-Boot ;-)
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 14:07 Alexander Dahl [this message]
2019-03-07 16:25 ` atmel nand bindings vs. actual dts files Alexander Dahl
2019-04-29 9:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-30 9:24 ` Alexander Dahl
2019-04-30 9:32 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-06-04 1:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-06-04 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1823900.qPX5mxbl1h@ada \
--to=ada@thorsis.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.