All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
	weiyongjun1@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v3] bonding: use WARN_ON instead of BUG in alb_upper_dev_walk
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:34:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18323.1700080449@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115174955.GV74656@kernel.org>

Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:

>On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:55:37PM CET, shaozhengchao@huawei.com wrote:
>> >If failed to allocate "tags" or could not find the final upper device from
>> >start_dev's upper list in bond_verify_device_path(), only the loopback
>> >detection of the current upper device should be affected, and the system is
>> >no need to be panic.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
>> >---
>> >v3: return -ENOMEM instead of zero to stop walk
>> >v2: use WARN_ON_ONCE instead of WARN_ON
>> 
>> Yet the WARN_ON is back :O
>
>Hi Jiri,
>
>I think the suggestion was to either:
>
>1. WARN_ON_ONCE(); return 0;      <= this was v2
>2. WARN_ON(); return -ESOMETHING; <= this is v3
>(But not, WARN_ON(); return 0;    <= this was v1)
>
>And after v2 it was determined that the approach taken here in v3 is
>preferred.
>
>So I think this patch is consistent with the feedback given by Jay
>in his reviews so far.

	Sigh, the more I look the more complicated this gets.
	
	Anyway, I was previously thinking we're ok with WARN_ON if the
return is non-zero to terminate the device walk.  The bond itself will
automatically call alb_upper_dev_walk at most once per second.

	However, user space could do something like continuously change
the MAC address of the bond or initiate a failover in order to trigger a
call to alb_upper_dev_walk.  This won't be rate limited, and if the
allocations there repeatedly fail, it would always trigger the WARN_ON.

	So, I'm thinking now that instead of WARN_anything, we should
instead use something like

net_err_ratelimited("%s: %s: allocation failure\n", start_dev->name, __func__);

	in bond_verify_device_path, and alb_upper_dev_walk doesn't do
any WARN at all, and returns failure (non-zero).
	
	This is consistent with other similar allocation failures.

	-J

>> >---
>> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 6 ++++--
>> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> >index dc2c7b979656..21f1cb8e453b 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> >@@ -984,8 +984,10 @@ static int alb_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper,
>> > 	 */
>> > 	if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
>> > 		tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
>> >-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
>> >-			BUG();
>> >+		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags)) {
>> >+			WARN_ON(1);
>> >+			return -ENOMEM;
>> >+		}
>> > 		alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
>> > 				tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
>> > 		kfree(tags);
>> >-- 
>> >2.34.1
>> >
>> >
>> 
>

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-15 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 11:55 [PATCH net-next,v3] bonding: use WARN_ON instead of BUG in alb_upper_dev_walk Zhengchao Shao
2023-11-15 14:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-11-15 17:49   ` Simon Horman
2023-11-15 20:34     ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2023-11-16 13:58       ` shaozhengchao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18323.1700080449@famine \
    --to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.