From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Linux Netdev List' <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
e1000-devel <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang"
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:04:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1837410.pEGIH05mML@storm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421337658.11734.76.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On Thursday, 15. January 2015 08:00:58 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Please apply this patch, and try to lower
> /proc/sys/net/core/gro_max_frags and see if this makes a difference
> (leaving GRO enabled)
>
> (start with 7 and increase it, limit being 17)
Patch applied to 3.19-rc4+.
Results:
7: hang
8: hang
9: hang
10: hang
11: hang
12: hang
13: hang
14: hang
15: hang
16: hang
17: hang
for the sake of completeness:
1: hang
2: hang
3: hang
4: hang
5: hang
6: hang
Regarding the test procedure: I stopped the download script on the client,
changed gro_max_frags and started the download again. No cable unplugging /
reboot of the box in between. Just mentioning it to make sure it somehow
does not affect what we actually wanted to test.
Additional tests have been done with gro_max_frags 1, 7 and 17:
- stop networking + unload e1000e -> restart -> download: hang
One thing I can say from the testing: The more I increase gro_max_frags,
the longer it takes to trigger it. I tried each setting below three times.
A value of 17 is really noticeable.
1: 3-8 seconds till hang
7: 7-10 seconds till hang
17: 23-26 seconds till hang
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 15:32 [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-14 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 10:11 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 14:58 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 15:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 15:48 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:04 ` Thomas Jarosch [this message]
2015-01-15 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:37 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 18:24 ` Re: Re: Re: " Eric Dumazet
2015-01-19 16:49 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-11 11:23 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-11 11:34 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-12 23:28 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-02-13 16:14 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-21 1:59 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-03-23 13:58 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-03-23 22:37 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-05-27 16:00 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-05-30 1:18 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-07-29 8:51 ` Thomas Jarosch
2019-05-02 12:58 ` Juliana Rodrigueiro
2015-02-12 1:18 ` nick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1837410.pEGIH05mML@storm \
--to=thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.