From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, jasvinder.singh@intel.com,
wenzhuo.lu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [pull-request] next-tm 17.08 pre-rc1
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 22:01:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1838852.sCttUoyffy@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499182731-86830-1-git-send-email-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Hi,
04/07/2017 17:38, Cristian Dumitrescu:
> http://dpdk.org/git/next/dpdk-next-tm
I'm sorry to not have considered this tree as a high priority.
I think it may be integrated in RC2 because it is a totally new area
and should not break any existing code.
I prefer to wait because I have seen some things to fix:
1/ There is a compilation error with clang (notified in related thread).
2/ Some functions are exposed in the API to query the ops.
It seems dangerous and useless:
- rte_eth_dev_tm_ops_get
- rte_tm_ops_get
3/ The PMD interface file is referenced in the doxygen index:
+ [rte_tm_driver] (@ref rte_tm_driver.h),
I see that rte_flow_driver.h is also referenced but it seems a mistake.
4/ As it is a totally new API, it should be declared as EXPERIMENTAL
in the MAINTAINERS file and in the doxygen.
5/ There is no doc in the programmer's guide.
6/ There is no application to test it.
I know that the points 5/ and 6/ are long to complete.
However I would like to know what is the plan?
And should we integrate TM in 17.08 without neither doc nor app?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-09 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-04 15:38 [pull-request] next-tm 17.08 pre-rc1 Cristian Dumitrescu
2017-07-04 15:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-04 16:52 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-04 20:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-05 10:36 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-09 20:01 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-07-10 7:43 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-07-10 7:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 10:55 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 12:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 13:21 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 13:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 15:46 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 15:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 16:47 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 16:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-11 18:20 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-12 17:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1838852.sCttUoyffy@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.