From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@fjellstrom.ca>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent drive errors
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 08:19:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1841554.OffkGPDYdo@balsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1505221535550.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
On Fri 22 May 2015 03:38:06 PM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> >> for x in /sys/block/sd[a-z] ; do
> >>
> >> echo 180 > $x/device/timeout
> >>
> >> done
> >
> > I presume it's ok to do that even if the drives do ERC/TLER? Just woke up,
> > but my brain seems to be telling me it shouldn't break anything since the
> > ERC drives should always return after 7s no matter what...
>
> Correct, the only downside is that if the drive really dies, it's going to
> take longer to detect this.
>
> I'd rather have longer timeouts to make sure drives never kicked out
> because of lack of ERC or something else, than to have drives kicked for
> some reason (controller reset, lack of ERC, or something else).
>
> I really really want to avoid drives being kicked for any other reason
> than them really being dead. I'd rather have reads stalled for a few
> minutes than this happening. For other use-cases, the requirements may be
> different.
Yeah, I agree. Especially given this is just my home nas and nas backup setup,
It's better to just stall rather than die horribly.
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
thomas@fjellstrom.ca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-22 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 11:08 Recent drive errors Thomas Fjellstrom
2015-05-19 12:34 ` Phil Turmel
2015-05-19 12:50 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2015-05-19 13:23 ` Phil Turmel
2015-05-19 14:32 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2015-05-19 14:51 ` Phil Turmel
2015-05-19 16:07 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2015-05-20 5:38 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2015-05-21 7:58 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-05-21 12:45 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2015-05-22 13:38 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-05-22 14:19 ` Thomas Fjellstrom [this message]
2015-05-22 7:07 ` Weedy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1841554.OffkGPDYdo@balsa \
--to=thomas@fjellstrom.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.