From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: auditing kdbus service names
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:38:14 -0400
Message-ID: <18456537.MDqL7RWdSn@x2>
References: <3754565.WlII3JJvve@sifl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <3754565.WlII3JJvve@sifl>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 08:40:34 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I'm currently working on a set of LSM hooks for the new kdbus IPC mechanism
> and one of the things that I believe we will need to add is a new audit
> field for the kdbus service name (very similar to the old fashioned dbus
> service name).  I was thinking "kdbus_svc" for the field name, any
> objections?

What was used on the old dbus events?

-Steve

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.242.250])
 by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7CLcHit018583
 for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:38:18 -0400
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>,
 Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>,
 linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: auditing kdbus service names
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:38:14 -0400
Message-ID: <18456537.MDqL7RWdSn@x2>
In-Reply-To: <3754565.WlII3JJvve@sifl>
References: <3754565.WlII3JJvve@sifl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
List-Id: "Security-Enhanced Linux \(SELinux\) mailing list"
 <selinux.tycho.nsa.gov>
List-Post: <mailto:selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:selinux-request@tycho.nsa.gov?subject=help>

On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 08:40:34 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I'm currently working on a set of LSM hooks for the new kdbus IPC mechanism
> and one of the things that I believe we will need to add is a new audit
> field for the kdbus service name (very similar to the old fashioned dbus
> service name).  I was thinking "kdbus_svc" for the field name, any
> objections?

What was used on the old dbus events?

-Steve