From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: okaratas@yandex.com (Ozgur Karatas)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:29:45 +0300
Subject: kernel development process question, patch review
In-Reply-To: <20170221013533.GA23212@eros>
References: <20170221013533.GA23212@eros>
Message-ID: <184861487698185@web28o.yandex.ru>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org


Hello,

I think the list idea is no need for confusion, it is desirable to provide people with a new kernel newbies update to this list with a help and a quick solution to their problems.
This is like pre-kernel training.

TO and CC already come with the get_maintainer.pl script.

TO: Primary responsible
CC: development group + kernel mailing list
Kernelnewbies = kernelnewbies help

Regards,

Ozgur

21.02.2017, 04:44, "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>:
> If a reviewer makes a suggestion and one intends on making the change
> as suggested is it required (normal protocol) to reply stating that
> the you understand their suggestion and intend on implementing it or
> is this just noise. Should one simply re send the next version of the
> patch?
>
> Continuing on this theme, should one add a Suggested-by: tag in the
> previous situation. Some where Documentation/process it states that no
> tag except the CC tag should be added without the authority of the
> person being named?
>
> thanks,
> Tobin.